Why is "blindsight" blind? A new perspective on primary visual cortex, recurrent activity and visual awareness

dc.contributorAalto-yliopistofi
dc.contributorAalto Universityen
dc.contributor.authorSilvanto, Juhaen_US
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Neuroscience and Biomedical Engineeringen
dc.date.accessioned2017-05-11T09:15:00Z
dc.date.available2017-05-11T09:15:00Z
dc.date.issued2015en_US
dc.description.abstractThe neuropsychological phenomenon of blindsight has been taken to suggest that the primary visual cortex (V1) plays a unique role in visual awareness, and that extrastriate activation needs to be fed back to V1 in order for the content of that activation to be consciously perceived. The aim of this review is to evaluate this theoretical framework and to revisit its key tenets. Firstly, is blindsight truly a dissociation of awareness and visual detection? Secondly, is there sufficient evidence to rule out the possibility that the loss of awareness resulting from a V1 lesion simply reflects reduced extrastriate responsiveness, rather than a unique role of V1 in conscious experience? Evaluation of these arguments and the empirical evidence leads to the conclusion that the loss of phenomenal awareness in blindsight may not be due to feedback activity in V1 being the hallmark awareness. On the basis of existing literature, an alternative explanation of blindsight is proposed. In this view, visual awareness is a “global” cognitive function as its hallmark is the availability of information to a large number of perceptual and cognitive systems; this requires inter-areal long-range synchronous oscillatory activity. For these oscillations to arise, a specific temporal profile of neuronal activity is required, which is established through recurrent feedback activity involving V1 and the extrastriate cortex. When V1 is lesioned, the loss of recurrent activity prevents inter-areal networks on the basis of oscillatory activity. However, as limited amount of input can reach extrastriate cortex and some extrastriate neuronal selectivity is preserved, computations involving comparison of neural firing rates within a cortical area remain possible. This enables “local” read-out from specific brain regions, allowing for the detection and discrimination of basic visual attributes. Thus blindsight is blind due to lack of “global” long-range synchrony, and it functions via “local” neural readout from extrastriate areas.en
dc.description.versionPeer revieweden
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen_US
dc.identifier.citationSilvanto, J 2015, 'Why is "blindsight" blind? A new perspective on primary visual cortex, recurrent activity and visual awareness', Consciousness and Cognition, vol. 32, no. March, pp. 15-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2014.08.001en
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.concog.2014.08.001en_US
dc.identifier.issn1053-8100
dc.identifier.issn1090-2376
dc.identifier.otherPURE UUID: f1b07f5c-8e06-4105-8cf2-5d2a5e913beaen_US
dc.identifier.otherPURE ITEMURL: https://research.aalto.fi/en/publications/f1b07f5c-8e06-4105-8cf2-5d2a5e913beaen_US
dc.identifier.otherPURE FILEURL: https://research.aalto.fi/files/11717286/1_s2.0_S1053810014001329_main.pdfen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://aaltodoc.aalto.fi/handle/123456789/25961
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:fi:aalto-201705114336
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherElsevier
dc.relation.ispartofseriesConsciousness and Cognitionen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesVolume 32, issue March, pp. 15-32en
dc.rightsopenAccessen
dc.subject.keywordBlindsighten_US
dc.subject.keywordFeedbacken_US
dc.subject.keywordInter-areal synchronyen_US
dc.subject.keywordOscillatory activityen_US
dc.subject.keywordPrimary visual cortex (V1)en_US
dc.subject.keywordTranscranial magnetic stimulationen_US
dc.titleWhy is "blindsight" blind? A new perspective on primary visual cortex, recurrent activity and visual awarenessen
dc.typeA1 Alkuperäisartikkeli tieteellisessä aikakauslehdessäfi
dc.type.versionpublishedVersion

Files