Experimental comparison of structural and active protective methods against breath- and cough-borne aerosols in a meeting room
No Thumbnail Available
Access rights
embargoedAccess
URL
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
A1 Alkuperäisartikkeli tieteellisessä aikakauslehdessä
This publication is imported from Aalto University research portal.
View publication in the Research portal (opens in new window)
Other link related to publication (opens in new window)
View publication in the Research portal (opens in new window)
Other link related to publication (opens in new window)
Date
2024-11-01
Major/Subject
Mcode
Degree programme
Language
en
Pages
12
Series
Building and Environment, Volume 265
Abstract
In this experimental study, the focus is to address the challenges of cross-contamination due to the presence of an infected individual in a meeting room environment. A detailed analysis is performed to identify effective methods to reduce the spread of infectious aerosols generated due to breathing and coughing. Infectious aerosols are simulated using a Paraffin oil-based solution with a respiratory exhalation simulator integrated with a breathing/coughing machine and an atomizer. Filtration-based active strategies such as the room air purifier, personal air purifier, and facemasks (FFP2 and surgical) along their wearing patterns are examined and compared with structural measures such as face shields and partition walls. The impact of the infectors' location on the exposed person is also studied. Facemasks are the most effective protective measure for both examined respiratory activities and provide over 60 % protection. Other mitigating strategies behaved differently for breathing and coughing trials. In the well-mixed room, during breathing, the portable room air purifier designed for clean air delivery rates (CADR) 2.5 times the ventilation rate effectively reduced aerosol spread. A personal air purifier, with a flow rate of 0.02 times the ventilation rate, offered only partial protection to the exposed occupant. Structural partitions showed marginal effectiveness for breathing but were effective during coughing events. The infector's location has little impact on contaminant levels in a well-mixed meeting room, except for a slight increase when seated next to the exposed person. This study provides a valuable reference for using different mitigation strategies in indoor settings.Description
Publisher Copyright: © 2024 Elsevier Ltd
Keywords
Air purifier, Airborne pathogens, Face masks, Meeting room, Partition wall, Respiratory aerosols
Other note
Citation
Ejaz, M F, Kilpeläinen, S, Lestinen, S & Kosonen, R 2024, ' Experimental comparison of structural and active protective methods against breath- and cough-borne aerosols in a meeting room ', Building and Environment, vol. 265, 111993 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2024.111993