Cost stickiness around the financial crisis – empirical evidence from the field of electronic equipment

dc.contributorAalto Universityen
dc.contributorAalto-yliopistofi
dc.contributor.advisorJarva, Henry
dc.contributor.authorMäättänen, Nelli
dc.contributor.departmentLaskentatoimen laitosfi
dc.contributor.schoolKauppakorkeakoulufi
dc.contributor.schoolSchool of Businessen
dc.date.accessioned2017-02-14T08:51:47Z
dc.date.available2017-02-14T08:51:47Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.description.abstractOver the past decade, there has been an increasing amount of discussion on the topic of short-run asymmetric cost response to activity changes. This kind of cost behaviour has been labelled as cost stickiness in the accounting literature. The model of cost stickiness suggests that the direction of the change in cost driver influences the magnitude of the change in the sense that cost are found to increase more than they decrease from an equivalent activity rise and fall. This is what differentiates the model from the traditional textbook cost model, which argues that cost changes follow linearly and proportionally the changes in the cost driver. Prior literature successfully finds cost stickiness in cross sectional samples and different individual factors that influence its existence. This study contributes to the literature by considering whether the existence and the degree of cost stickiness is conditional to external circumstances in a field specific sample. The purpose is to evaluate the influence of economic downturn to the existence and degree variation of cost stickiness. The focus is on degree variations before and after the financial crisis of 2008 in the field of electronic equipment. This study is conducted through an empirical model that evaluates selling, general and administrative cost changes relative to contemporaneous sales revenue changes. The data sample consist of US listed companies in the field of electronic equipment during 2001-2015. The data is derived from Compustat database of Wharton Research Data Services. The results of the study suggest that economic downturn influences the degree of cost stickiness but the variation is subject to the field in question. No statistically significant results are found in the degree variation of the field of electronic equipment. However, results from additionally conducted robustness test identify that the field of retail and wholesale, shows more cost stickiness after the beginning of the crisis than before it. This study strengthens the findings of prior literature and offers evidence of the influence of external factors to the degree of cost stickiness.en
dc.ethesisid14854
dc.format.extent48
dc.identifier.urihttps://aaltodoc.aalto.fi/handle/123456789/24586
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:fi:aalto-201702142391
dc.language.isoenen
dc.locationP1 Ifi
dc.programmeAccountingen
dc.subject.heleconlaskentatoimifi
dc.subject.helecontoimialatfi
dc.subject.heleconelektroniikkafi
dc.subject.helecontavaratfi
dc.subject.heleconkustannuksetfi
dc.subject.helecontalouskriisifi
dc.subject.keywordcost stickinessen
dc.subject.keywordasymmetric cost responseen
dc.subject.keywordcost behaviouren
dc.subject.keywordfinancial crisisen
dc.titleCost stickiness around the financial crisis – empirical evidence from the field of electronic equipmenten
dc.typeG2 Pro gradu, diplomityöfi
dc.type.ontasotMaster's thesisen
dc.type.ontasotMaisterin opinnäytefi
Files