A Workflow for Building Computationally Rational Models of Human Behavior
Loading...
Access rights
openAccess
publishedVersion
URL
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
A1 Alkuperäisartikkeli tieteellisessä aikakauslehdessä
This publication is imported from Aalto University research portal.
View publication in the Research portal (opens in new window)
View/Open full text file from the Research portal (opens in new window)
Other link related to publication (opens in new window)
View publication in the Research portal (opens in new window)
View/Open full text file from the Research portal (opens in new window)
Other link related to publication (opens in new window)
Date
2024-09
Major/Subject
Mcode
Degree programme
Language
en
Pages
21
Series
Computational Brain and Behavior, Volume 7, issue 3, pp. 399-419
Abstract
Computational rationality explains human behavior as arising due to the maximization of expected utility under the constraints imposed by the environment and limited cognitive resources. This simple assumption, when instantiated via partially observable Markov decision processes (POMDPs), gives rise to a powerful approach for modeling human adaptive behavior, within which a variety of internal models of cognition can be embedded. In particular, such an instantiation enables the use of methods from reinforcement learning (RL) to approximate the optimal policy solution to the sequential decision-making problems posed to the cognitive system in any given setting; this stands in contrast to requiring ad hoc hand-crafted rules for capturing adaptive behavior in more traditional cognitive architectures. However, despite their successes and promise for modeling human adaptive behavior across everyday tasks, computationally rational models that use RL are not easy to build. Being a hybrid of theoretical cognitive models and machine learning (ML) necessitates that model building take into account appropriate practices from both cognitive science and ML. The design of psychological assumptions and machine learning decisions concerning reward specification, policy optimization, parameter inference, and model selection are all tangled processes rife with pitfalls that can hinder the development of valid and effective models. Drawing from a decade of work on this approach, a workflow is outlined for tackling this challenge and is accompanied by a detailed discussion of the pros and cons at key decision points.Description
Publisher Copyright: © The Author(s) 2024.
Keywords
Computational rationality, Modeling workflow, POMDPs, Resource rationality
Other note
Citation
Chandramouli, S, Shi, D, Putkonen, A, De Peuter, S, Zhang, S, Jokinen, J P P, Howes, A & Oulasvirta, A 2024, ' A Workflow for Building Computationally Rational Models of Human Behavior ', Computational Brain and Behavior, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 399-419 . https://doi.org/10.1007/s42113-024-00208-6