Risk management in public land development projects: Comparative case study in Finland, and the Netherlands
No Thumbnail Available
Access rights
openAccess
acceptedVersion
URL
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
A1 Alkuperäisartikkeli tieteellisessä aikakauslehdessä
This publication is imported from Aalto University research portal.
View publication in the Research portal (opens in new window)
View/Open full text file from the Research portal (opens in new window)
Other link related to publication (opens in new window)
View publication in the Research portal (opens in new window)
View/Open full text file from the Research portal (opens in new window)
Other link related to publication (opens in new window)
Date
2017-03-01
Department
Major/Subject
Mcode
Degree programme
Language
en
Pages
12
Series
Land Use Policy, Volume 62, pp. 246-257
Abstract
Public land development is an approach where the public authority acquires land for development, services the land with public infrastructure, and transfers the serviced building plots to private building developers or self-developing end-users. Motivations to use public land development can be divided to planning goal related motivations and financial motivations. In this paper, we study management of public risks related to the use of public land development by analysing case studies located in Finland and the Netherlands, countries known to have strong tradition in public land development. Our findings indicate that, whereas public land development has efficiencies in managing the risks related to the achievement of public planning goals, the management of the financial risks related to the public land development approach can be remarkably difficult even in countries with wide experience in public land development.Description
Keywords
Finland, Planning goals, Public land development, Risk management, The Netherlands, Value capturing
Other note
Citation
Valtonen, E, Falkenbach, H & van der Krabben, E 2017, ' Risk management in public land development projects : Comparative case study in Finland, and the Netherlands ', Land Use Policy, vol. 62, pp. 246-257 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.12.016