Corporate M&A regulatory strategy - Perspectives on EU merger control / The case of Outokumpu and Inoxum

dc.contributorAalto-yliopistofi
dc.contributorAalto Universityen
dc.contributor.authorJuhász, Norbert
dc.contributor.departmentJohtamisen ja kansainvälisen liiketoiminnan laitosfi
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Management and International Businessen
dc.contributor.schoolKauppakorkeakoulufi
dc.contributor.schoolSchool of Businessen
dc.date.accessioned2014-02-19T13:12:11Z
dc.date.available2014-02-19T13:12:11Z
dc.date.dateaccepted2013-10-11
dc.date.issued2013
dc.description.abstractThe objective of this thesis is to study challenges that companies can encounter during the merger control process of the European Union. Perspectives on EU merger control are set to be contrasted with relevant issues of industry structure, international competition and growth strategy by mergers and acquisitions (M&A). The study aims to provide a framework that companies in the future can use to plan their regulatory approach in order to go through the EU process faster and more efficiently. A single case study approach was selected for the research. The study relies on both secondary and primary qualitative data sources. Primary data comes in the form of interviews with key senior managers of the case company who were closely involved with the EU approval process. Primary data is processed with the use of thematic networks. Secondary data sources are newspapers, public EU and Outokumpu sources. The research study finds that EU merger control can exert a great influence on firms' competitive strategy considerations. On one hand, firms need to calculate with the presence and anticipated attitude of the EU authority which can impact their strategy yet before any notified M&A transaction. On the other hand, the EU authority can modify firms' strategy during a merger control process through merger remedy requests. The study furthermore finds that important differences can exist between merging firms and the EU authority in relation to how a merger case is methodologically evaluated. The main differentiating point between the case company and the EU authority was found to be the EU authority's stubbornly European view on a global business. Such differences can have profound implications for the decision outcome.en
dc.ethesisid13507
dc.format.extent133
dc.identifier.urihttps://aaltodoc.aalto.fi/handle/123456789/12635
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:fi:aalto-201402231463
dc.language.isoenen
dc.locationP1 Ifi
dc.programme.majorInternational Businessen
dc.programme.majorKansainvälinen liiketoimintafi
dc.subject.heleconkansainväliset yhtiöt
dc.subject.heleconinternational companies
dc.subject.heleconyrityskaupat
dc.subject.heleconcorporate acquisitions
dc.subject.heleconvalvonta
dc.subject.heleconcontrol
dc.subject.heleconEU
dc.subject.heleconEU
dc.subject.heleconstrategia
dc.subject.heleconstrategy
dc.subject.heleconlobbaus
dc.subject.heleconlobbying
dc.subject.heleconkonflikti
dc.subject.heleconconflicts
dc.subject.keywordindustry structure
dc.subject.keywordmergers and acquisitions
dc.subject.keywordM&A
dc.subject.keywordmerger control
dc.subject.keywordmerger regulation
dc.subject.keywordEuropean Commission
dc.subject.keywordregulatory strategy
dc.subject.keywordefficiency claim
dc.subject.keywordmerger remedy
dc.subject.keywordlobbying
dc.subject.keywordconflict of interest
dc.titleCorporate M&A regulatory strategy - Perspectives on EU merger control / The case of Outokumpu and Inoxumen
dc.typeG2 Pro gradu, diplomityöfi
dc.type.dcmitypetexten
dc.type.ontasotMaster's thesisen
dc.type.ontasotPro gradu tutkielmafi
local.aalto.idthes13507
local.aalto.openaccessno

Files