Comparing additive manufacturing processes for distributed manufacturing

dc.contributorAalto-yliopistofi
dc.contributorAalto Universityen
dc.contributor.authorSalmi, Mikaen_US
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Energy and Mechanical Engineeringen
dc.contributor.groupauthorAdvanced Manufacturing and Materialsen
dc.date.accessioned2022-12-14T10:16:14Z
dc.date.available2022-12-14T10:16:14Z
dc.date.issued2022-10en_US
dc.description.abstractAdditive manufacturing (AM) has been considered for distributed manufacturing. However, the consideration has usually concerned AM in general, not specific AM processes. This paper will look at the properties of different processes for distributed manufacturing from the perspective of the AM process and materials, post-processing, the requirements for devices and spaces, and raw materials. The findings show that powder bed fusion and binder jetting pose challenges for distributed manufacturing. The material extrusion process (MEX) can be affordable in a distributed form. It would be the ideal option when the demand for parts is low. VAT photopolymerization has similarities to MEX but is slightly more expensive and has a more demanding post-processing phase. However, it can be scaled up for higher production rates when demand is higher. Copyright (C) 2022 The Authors.en
dc.description.versionPeer revieweden
dc.format.extent6
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen_US
dc.identifier.citationSalmi, M 2022, 'Comparing additive manufacturing processes for distributed manufacturing', IFAC-PapersOnLine, vol. 55, no. 10, pp. 1503-1508. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2022.09.603en
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ifacol.2022.09.603en_US
dc.identifier.issn2405-8963
dc.identifier.otherPURE UUID: 4c789cd2-f007-44fe-b58b-fc13078078eben_US
dc.identifier.otherPURE ITEMURL: https://research.aalto.fi/en/publications/4c789cd2-f007-44fe-b58b-fc13078078eben_US
dc.identifier.otherPURE FILEURL: https://research.aalto.fi/files/94250959/1_s2.0_S2405896322019139_main.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttps://aaltodoc.aalto.fi/handle/123456789/118141
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:fi:aalto-202212146881
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherElsevier
dc.relation.fundinginfoThe Academy of Finland funded this study, grant number 325509 (Direct digital manufacturing in health care production and operations DiDiMinH).
dc.relation.ispartofseriesIFAC-PapersOnLineen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesVolume 55, issue 10, pp. 1503-1508en
dc.rightsopenAccessen
dc.subject.keyword3D printingen_US
dc.subject.keyworddistributed manufacturingen_US
dc.subject.keywordlocal manufacturingen_US
dc.subject.keywordadditive manufacturingen_US
dc.subject.keywordrapid manufacturingen_US
dc.subject.keywordmaterial extrusionen_US
dc.subject.keywordbinder jettingen_US
dc.subject.keywordpowder bed fusionen_US
dc.subject.keywordVAT photopolymerizationen_US
dc.titleComparing additive manufacturing processes for distributed manufacturingen
dc.typeA1 Alkuperäisartikkeli tieteellisessä aikakauslehdessäfi
dc.type.versionpublishedVersion

Files