Comparing additive manufacturing processes for distributed manufacturing

Thumbnail Image

Access rights

openAccess

URL

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

A1 Alkuperäisartikkeli tieteellisessä aikakauslehdessä

Date

2022-10

Department

Department of Energy and Mechanical Engineering

Major/Subject

Mcode

Degree programme

Language

en

Pages

6
1503-1508

Series

IFAC-PapersOnLine, Volume 55, issue 10

Abstract

Additive manufacturing (AM) has been considered for distributed manufacturing. However, the consideration has usually concerned AM in general, not specific AM processes. This paper will look at the properties of different processes for distributed manufacturing from the perspective of the AM process and materials, post-processing, the requirements for devices and spaces, and raw materials. The findings show that powder bed fusion and binder jetting pose challenges for distributed manufacturing. The material extrusion process (MEX) can be affordable in a distributed form. It would be the ideal option when the demand for parts is low. VAT photopolymerization has similarities to MEX but is slightly more expensive and has a more demanding post-processing phase. However, it can be scaled up for higher production rates when demand is higher. Copyright (C) 2022 The Authors.

Description

Keywords

3D printing, distributed manufacturing, local manufacturing, additive manufacturing, rapid manufacturing, material extrusion, binder jetting, powder bed fusion, VAT photopolymerization

Other note

Citation

Salmi, M 2022, ' Comparing additive manufacturing processes for distributed manufacturing ', IFAC-PapersOnLine, vol. 55, no. 10, pp. 1503-1508 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2022.09.603