“100% renewable” electricity contracts : Assessing availability and emissions through temporal analysis
Loading...
Access rights
openAccess
CC BY
CC BY
publishedVersion
URL
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
A1 Alkuperäisartikkeli tieteellisessä aikakauslehdessä
This publication is imported from Aalto University research portal.
View publication in the Research portal (opens in new window)
View/Open full text file from the Research portal (opens in new window)
View publication in the Research portal (opens in new window)
View/Open full text file from the Research portal (opens in new window)
Unless otherwise stated, all rights belong to the author. You may download, display and print this publication for Your own personal use. Commercial use is prohibited.
Authors
Date
Major/Subject
Mcode
Degree programme
Language
en
Pages
12
Series
Energy, Volume 322
Abstract
Electricity contracts marketed as “100% renewable” are typically based on certification schemes like Guarantees of Origin, which certify production sources but fail to ensure linkage between generation and consumption. This study evaluates the availability and emission impact of temporally and geographically matched green electricity contracts using granular data on renewable generation, cross-border transmission flows, emission factors, and household electricity consumption. Results reveal major discrepancies between Guarantee of Origin-based claims and actual renewable availability. Solar-only contracts are infeasible for continuous supply, while wind-only contracts could meet just 0.03%–0.11% of Finland's total hourly load continuously in 2021–2023. Households could still achieve substantial emission reductions with the proposed temporally and geographically matched renewable contracts, but 100% savings cannot be guaranteed due to limited availability and competing demand for renewables. Solar contracts could offer up to 41% annual emission savings, though savings decline rapidly as solar demand exceeds availability. Household heating type has little effect on percentage savings, while electric-heated homes with mixed-renewable contracts achieve the highest absolute savings. Load shifting presents a viable alternative, offering average theoretical emission savings of 8%–10% with a 12-h shifting window, demonstrating significant emission reduction opportunities without requiring specific green contracts.Description
Publisher Copyright: © 2025 The Author
Other note
Citation
Einolander, J 2025, '“100% renewable” electricity contracts : Assessing availability and emissions through temporal analysis', Energy, vol. 322, 135604. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2025.135604