Justifying AI Regulation: Examining Multi-Stakeholder Responses to the AI Act
Loading...
Access rights
openAccess
CC BY
CC BY
publishedVersion
URL
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
A1 Alkuperäisartikkeli tieteellisessä aikakauslehdessä
This publication is imported from Aalto University research portal.
View publication in the Research portal (opens in new window)
View/Open full text file from the Research portal (opens in new window)
Other link related to publication (opens in new window)
View publication in the Research portal (opens in new window)
View/Open full text file from the Research portal (opens in new window)
Other link related to publication (opens in new window)
Unless otherwise stated, all rights belong to the author. You may download, display and print this publication for Your own personal use. Commercial use is prohibited.
Date
2025-06
Department
Major/Subject
Mcode
Degree programme
Language
en
Pages
Series
Telematics and Informatics, Volume 99
Abstract
The regulation of artificial intelligence (AI) has sparked discussions among stakeholders since the introduction of the European AI Act (AIA) regulatory proposal. This study examines how stakeholders justified their arguments around AI and its regulation in multi-stakeholder feedback on the first draft of the AIA. Drawing on the framework of social justifications (Boltanski and Thévenot, 2006) and leveraging Natural Language Inference (NLI) for assisted reading, the paper identifies areas of contestation and similarity between stakeholders from the technology industry, academia, non-governmental organizations, and the public sector. The findings show that stakeholders employed similar justifications to differing ends, suggesting that there exists some shared conception or tactical recognition of the types of justifications that are considered effective in this context. The paper argues that industry-driven discourse influences how stakeholders argue for and against regulating AI, and that justifications differ in the means they propose for achieving a similar end goal.Description
Keywords
AI regulation, Natural language inference, AI Act, AI discourse, Justification
Other note
Citation
Kajava, K, Gonzalez Torres, A P, Rannisto, A & Sakai, S 2025, ' Justifying AI Regulation: Examining Multi-Stakeholder Responses to the AI Act ', Telematics and Informatics, vol. 99, 102278 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2025.102278