Interlaboratory Comparison of the PV Module Energy Rating Standard IEC 61853-3

Simple item page
dc.contributorAalto-yliopistofi
dc.contributorAalto Universityen
dc.contributor.authorVogt, M.Ren_US
dc.contributor.authorRiechelmann, S.en_US
dc.contributor.authorGracia-Amillo, A.M.en_US
dc.contributor.authorDriesse, Antonen_US
dc.contributor.authorKokka, Alexanderen_US
dc.contributor.authorMaham, Kinzaen_US
dc.contributor.authorKärhä, Petrien_US
dc.contributor.authorKenny, R.en_US
dc.contributor.authorSchinke, C.en_US
dc.contributor.authorBothe, Karstenen_US
dc.contributor.authorBlakesley, J.C.en_US
dc.contributor.authorMusic, E.en_US
dc.contributor.authorPlag, Fabianen_US
dc.contributor.authorFriesen, G.en_US
dc.contributor.authorCorbellini, G.en_US
dc.contributor.authorRiedel-Lyngskær, N.en_US
dc.contributor.authorValckenborg, R.en_US
dc.contributor.authorSchweiger, M.en_US
dc.contributor.authorHerrmann, W.en_US
dc.contributor.departmentDept Signal Process and Acousten
dc.contributor.groupauthorMetrology Research Instituteen
dc.contributor.organizationInstitut für Solarenergieforschung GmbHen_US
dc.contributor.organizationPhysikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalten_US
dc.contributor.organizationEuropean Commission Joint Research Centreen_US
dc.contributor.organizationPhotovoltaic Performance Labsen_US
dc.contributor.organizationNational Physical Laboratory (NPL)en_US
dc.contributor.organizationUniversity of Applied Sciences and Arts of Southern Switzerlanden_US
dc.contributor.organizationTechnical University of Denmarken_US
dc.contributor.organizationNetherlands Organisation for Applied Scientific Researchen_US
dc.contributor.organizationTÜV Rheinland Energy GmbHen_US
dc.date.accessioned2021-02-09T09:06:22Z
dc.date.available2021-02-09T09:06:22Z
dc.date.issued2020en_US
dc.description.abstractThe IEC 61853 standard series "Photovoltaic (PV) module performance testing and energy rating" aims to provide a standardized measure for PV module performance, namely the Climate Specific Energy Rating (CSER). An algorithm to calculate CSER is specified in part 3 based on laboratory measurements defined in parts 1 and 2 as well as the climate data set given in part 4. To test the comparability and clarity of the algorithm in part 3, we share the same input data, obtained by measuring a standard photovoltaic module, among different research organizations. Each participant then uses their individual implementations of the algorithm to calculate the resulting CSER values. The initial blind comparison reveals differences of 0.133 (14.7%) in CSER between the ten different implementations of the algorithm. Despite the differences in CSER, an analysis of intermediate results revealed differences of less than 1% at each step of the calculation chain among at least three participants. Thereby, we identify the extrapolation of the power table, the handling of the differences in the wavelength bands between measurement and climate data set, and several coding errors as the three biggest sources for the differences. After discussing the results and comparing different approaches, all participants rework their implementations individually and compare the results two more times. In the third intercomparison, the differences are less than 0.029 (3.2%) in CSER. When excluding the remaining three outliers, the largest absolute difference between the other seven participants is 0.0037 (0.38%). Based on our findings we identified four recommendations for improvement of the standard series.en
dc.description.versionPeer revieweden
dc.format.extent5
dc.format.extent811-815
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen_US
dc.identifier.citationVogt, M R, Riechelmann, S, Gracia-Amillo, A M, Driesse, A, Kokka, A, Maham, K, Kärhä, P, Kenny, R, Schinke, C, Bothe, K, Blakesley, J C, Music, E, Plag, F, Friesen, G, Corbellini, G, Riedel-Lyngskær, N, Valckenborg, R, Schweiger, M & Herrmann, W 2020, Interlaboratory Comparison of the PV Module Energy Rating Standard IEC 61853-3 . in Proceedings of the European Photovoltaic Solar Energy Conference and Exhibition . Proceedings of the European Photovoltaic Solar Energy Conference and Exhibition, WIP Wirtschaft und Infrastruktur GmbH & Co. Planungs KG, pp. 811-815, European Photovoltaic Solar Energy Conference and Exhibition, Virtual, Online, 07/09/2020 . https://doi.org/10.4229/EUPVSEC20202020-4BO.13.2en
dc.identifier.doi10.4229/EUPVSEC20202020-4BO.13.2en_US
dc.identifier.isbn3-936338-73-6
dc.identifier.issn2196-100X
dc.identifier.otherPURE UUID: 5b610ff3-e2b1-40e2-a095-7ae650a50b62en_US
dc.identifier.otherPURE ITEMURL: https://research.aalto.fi/en/publications/5b610ff3-e2b1-40e2-a095-7ae650a50b62en_US
dc.identifier.otherPURE FILEURL: https://research.aalto.fi/files/55801061/4BO.13.2_paper.pdfen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://aaltodoc.aalto.fi/handle/123456789/102648
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:fi:aalto-202102091948
dc.language.isoenen
dc.relation.ispartofEuropean Photovoltaic Solar Energy Conference and Exhibitionen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesProceedings of the European Photovoltaic Solar Energy Conference and Exhibitionen
dc.rightsopenAccessen
dc.subject.keywordEnergy Ratingen_US
dc.subject.keywordPV Moduleen_US
dc.subject.keywordEnergy Performanceen_US
dc.titleInterlaboratory Comparison of the PV Module Energy Rating Standard IEC 61853-3en
dc.typeA4 Artikkeli konferenssijulkaisussafi
dc.type.versionpublishedVersion
Files
Collections
[article-cris] Sähkötekniikan korkeakoulu / ELEC