Comparative Analysis of Plagiarism Detection Systems
Access rights
openAccess
URL
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
A1 Alkuperäisartikkeli tieteellisessä aikakauslehdessä
This publication is imported from Aalto University research portal.
View publication in the Research portal (opens in new window)
View/Open full text file from the Research portal (opens in new window)
View publication in the Research portal (opens in new window)
View/Open full text file from the Research portal (opens in new window)
Authors
Date
2017-11-11
Department
Major/Subject
Mcode
Degree programme
Language
en
Pages
9
27-35
27-35
Series
Business Ethics and Leadership, Volume 1, issue 3
Abstract
This article compares plagiarism detection systems according to the list of criteria, compiled from the most challenging and important features for users in Ukrainian higher educational institutions. In addition it describes types of text-based plagiarism and provides an overview of the most common and serious forms of plagiarism around the world and in Ukraine in particular. The authors carried out a comparative analysis of three plagiarism detection systems − Turnitin, Unicheck, eTXT − and highlighted advantages and disadvantages of each one for the use in Ukraine. However, in further studies there are might be a need for revising and expanding the list of criteria depending on the subject and the aim of using plagiarism checkers.Description
Keywords
plagiarism, plagiarism detection system, text-based plagiarism, plagiarism forms
Other note
Citation
Shkodkina, Y & Pacauskas, D 2017, ' Comparative Analysis of Plagiarism Detection Systems ', Business Ethics and Leadership, vol. 1, no. 3, 4, pp. 27-35 .