Different flexibility options for better system integration of wind power
dc.contributor | Aalto-yliopisto | fi |
dc.contributor | Aalto University | en |
dc.contributor.author | Pilpola, Sannamari | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Lund, Peter D. | en_US |
dc.contributor.department | Department of Applied Physics | en |
dc.contributor.groupauthor | New Energy Technologies | en |
dc.date.accessioned | 2019-07-30T07:15:27Z | |
dc.date.available | 2019-07-30T07:15:27Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2019-11-01 | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | Variable renewable electricity (VRE) will play an important role in future energy systems, but additional flexibility measures will be needed to integrate large-scale VRE into energy systems. Here we investigate the effectiveness of different flexibility options to integrate wind power, using the Finnish energy system as a case. The main flexibility options considered are sector-coupling such as power-to-heat and power-to-gas, energy storages, and electric vehicles. The results indicate that the share of wind power could be increased up to one third of all electricity, limited by the cross-border transmission capacity and the high share of nuclear power in the Finnish case, while simultaneously decreasing annual system costs and carbon emissions. Power-to-heat and wind power curtailment were the most cost-effective flexibility options. Furthermore, combined heat and power (CHP) and nuclear power could form a barrier to cost-effective wind power integration, suggesting that viewing the energy system as a whole provides valuable insight for wind power integration. | en |
dc.description.version | Peer reviewed | en |
dc.format.extent | 1-11 | |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Pilpola, S & Lund, P D 2019, ' Different flexibility options for better system integration of wind power ', Energy Strategy Reviews, vol. 26, 100368, pp. 1-11 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2019.100368 | en |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.esr.2019.100368 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 2211-467X | |
dc.identifier.other | PURE UUID: 366743e0-d98a-4c58-8e86-09db09c45931 | en_US |
dc.identifier.other | PURE ITEMURL: https://research.aalto.fi/en/publications/366743e0-d98a-4c58-8e86-09db09c45931 | en_US |
dc.identifier.other | PURE LINK: http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85066618827&partnerID=8YFLogxK | en_US |
dc.identifier.other | PURE FILEURL: https://research.aalto.fi/files/35132300/1_s2.0_S2211467X19300550_main.pdf | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://aaltodoc.aalto.fi/handle/123456789/39410 | |
dc.identifier.urn | URN:NBN:fi:aalto-201907304465 | |
dc.language.iso | en | en |
dc.publisher | Elsevier | |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | Energy Strategy Reviews | en |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | Volume 26 | en |
dc.rights | openAccess | en |
dc.subject.keyword | Energy system flexibility | en_US |
dc.subject.keyword | Energy system modelling | en_US |
dc.subject.keyword | Finland | en_US |
dc.subject.keyword | Wind power integration | en_US |
dc.title | Different flexibility options for better system integration of wind power | en |
dc.type | A1 Alkuperäisartikkeli tieteellisessä aikakauslehdessä | fi |
dc.type.version | publishedVersion |