Building illusory unity with Ernesto Laclau - Why 'closure' should not be a dirty word in planning theory
Loading...
Access rights
openAccess
CC BY
CC BY
publishedVersion
URL
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
A1 Alkuperäisartikkeli tieteellisessä aikakauslehdessä
This publication is imported from Aalto University research portal.
View publication in the Research portal (opens in new window)
View/Open full text file from the Research portal (opens in new window)
Other link related to publication (opens in new window)
View publication in the Research portal (opens in new window)
View/Open full text file from the Research portal (opens in new window)
Other link related to publication (opens in new window)
Unless otherwise stated, all rights belong to the author. You may download, display and print this publication for Your own personal use. Commercial use is prohibited.
Authors
Date
Department
Major/Subject
Mcode
Degree programme
Language
en
Pages
22
Series
Planning Theory, Volume 24, issue 4, pp. 370-391
Abstract
Critically oriented planning theories aim for emancipation and systemic change. This paper explores the challenges of communicative and agonistic approaches in achieving this goal, arguing that difficulties arise when these theories are applied at inappropriate operational levels. By examining these approaches in terms of opening and closing political space – crucial for initiating and securing systemic change – it highlights the risks of overemphasizing disagreement and opening-up, which can hinder reflexive decision-making in planning and ultimately systemic change. Drawing on Ernesto Laclau and Chantal Mouffe’s hegemony theory and Laclau’s populism theory, the paper proposes a framework that balances opening and closing by fostering a unity and collective will that facilitates decision-making while pursuing systemic change. This unity, while necessary, is ultimately illusory in nature; a tool for temporarily stabilizing new hegemonic orders when navigating the field of planning marked by difference and disagreement.Description
Keywords
Closing-down, Closure, Decision-making, Emancipation, Ernesto Laclau, Guggenheim Helsinki, Opening-up, Planning democracy, Populism, Postfoundational theory, Social transformation, Systemic change, emancipation, populism, closing-down, planning democracy, systemic change, opening-up, social transformation, decision-making, postfoundational theory, closure
Other note
Citation
Hirvola, A 2025, 'Building illusory unity with Ernesto Laclau - Why 'closure' should not be a dirty word in planning theory', Planning Theory, vol. 24, no. 4, 14730952251343701, pp. 370-391. https://doi.org/10.1177/14730952251343701