Pluralitas non est ponenda sine necessitate

Simple item page
dc.contributorAalto-yliopistofi
dc.contributorAalto Universityen
dc.contributor.authorBengs, Christeren_US
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Built Environmenten
dc.contributor.editorCalabro, Fen_US
dc.contributor.editorDellaSpina, Len_US
dc.contributor.groupauthorPlanning and Transportationen
dc.date.accessioned2017-11-21T13:36:15Z
dc.date.available2017-11-21T13:36:15Z
dc.date.issued2016en_US
dc.description.abstractInternational documents and charters list matters to be considered when protecting built environment, but they do not tell how to evaluate them. Here, a model for evaluation is presented based on a complex and dynamic understanding of value. This model is concerted with a model for distribution of heritage goods according to kind of market. The idea of evaluators as experts is criticised as evaluation is always a unique and individual act. Only knowledge about criteria used in evaluation, not evaluating as such, can be accumulated and thereby professionalised. (C) 2016 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.en
dc.description.versionPeer revieweden
dc.format.extent7
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen_US
dc.identifier.citationBengs, C 2016, Pluralitas non est ponenda sine necessitate. in F Calabro & L DellaSpina (eds), 2ND INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM NEW METROPOLITAN PERSPECTIVES - STRATEGIC PLANNING, SPATIAL PLANNING, ECONOMIC PROGRAMS AND DECISION SUPPORT TOOLS, THROUGH THE IMPLEMENTATION OF HORIZON/EUROPE2020, (ISTH2020). Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, vol. 223, Elsevier, pp. 561-567, International Symposium on New Metropolitan Perspectives, Reggio Calabria, Italy, 18/05/2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.05.344en
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.05.344en_US
dc.identifier.issn1877-0428
dc.identifier.otherPURE UUID: 603bdb1e-dd59-484d-8834-40b9d9c59772en_US
dc.identifier.otherPURE ITEMURL: https://research.aalto.fi/en/publications/603bdb1e-dd59-484d-8834-40b9d9c59772en_US
dc.identifier.otherPURE FILEURL: https://research.aalto.fi/files/15809770/1_s2.0_S1877042816304244_main.pdfen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://aaltodoc.aalto.fi/handle/123456789/28796
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:fi:aalto-201711217617
dc.language.isoenen
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Symposium on New Metropolitan Perspectivesen
dc.relation.ispartofseries2ND INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM NEW METROPOLITAN PERSPECTIVES - STRATEGIC PLANNING, SPATIAL PLANNING, ECONOMIC PROGRAMS AND DECISION SUPPORT TOOLS, THROUGH THE IMPLEMENTATION OF HORIZON/EUROPE2020, (ISTH2020)en
dc.relation.ispartofseriespp. 561-567en
dc.relation.ispartofseriesProcedia Social and Behavioral Sciences ; Volume 223en
dc.rightsopenAccessen
dc.rightsCC BY-NC-NDen_US
dc.rights.copyright2016 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)en_US
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.subject.keywordHeritageen_US
dc.subject.keywordevaluationen_US
dc.subject.keywordexpertiseen_US
dc.subject.keywordNATIONAL CULTUREen_US
dc.titlePluralitas non est ponenda sine necessitateen
dc.typeA4 Artikkeli konferenssijulkaisussafi
dc.type.versionpublishedVersion

Files

Collections

[article-cris] Insinööritieteiden korkeakoulu / ENG