Review on data valuation approaches
No Thumbnail Available
URL
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
School of Business |
Bachelor's thesis
Electronic archive copy is available locally at the Harald Herlin Learning Centre. The staff of Aalto University has access to the electronic bachelor's theses by logging into Aaltodoc with their personal Aalto user ID. Read more about the availability of the bachelor's theses.
Authors
Date
2020
Department
Major/Subject
Mcode
Degree programme
Tieto- ja palvelujohtaminen
Language
en
Pages
27
Series
Abstract
Data is an essential asset of a company and has significant economic value. In order to fully exploit this value, it needs to be properly measured. Still, we are unable to numerically establish its worth. Challenges with data valuation are due to its values’ ambiguous and multi-dimensional nature. As a result, assessing the value of data is more complex than of conventional assets. Personal user data is an essential and topical aspect of data and is therefore used in this thesis as an example to illustrate challenges with valuation. There are no generally accepted methods for data valuation and there is especially little research on personal data valuation. To better understand the issue, this thesis investigates current data valuation approaches. This thesis is conducted as a literature review. To understand data valuation methods, the data value generation process, elements of data, its value drivers and economic laws effecting data will be discussed. Furthermore, the focus is on assessing the key models and their suitability to evaluating data. The key findings are that literature does not prefer any particular valuation model or approach but instead, the suitability of a method is dependent on use case and context. The intangible asset valuation framework stands out, as it is often discussed and used in data valuation context. In evaluating their data assets, companies should apply multiple methods from the intangible framework for the best result.Description
Thesis advisor
Tinnilä, MarkkuKeywords
intangible asset model, data value, data assets, personal data, data value chain