Does a trade-off between fertility and predation risk explain social evolution in baboons?
No Thumbnail Available
Access rights
restrictedAccess
URL
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
A1 Alkuperäisartikkeli tieteellisessä aikakauslehdessä
This publication is imported from Aalto University research portal.
View publication in the Research portal (opens in new window)
Other link related to publication (opens in new window)
View publication in the Research portal (opens in new window)
Other link related to publication (opens in new window)
Authors
Date
2018-12-23
Department
Major/Subject
Mcode
Degree programme
Language
en
Pages
Series
JOURNAL OF ZOOLOGY
Abstract
The distribution of group sizes in woodland baboons forms a pair of demographic oscillators that trade fertility off against predation risk. Fertility rates, however, set an upper limit on group size of around 90–95 animals. Despite this, two species of baboons (hamadryas and gelada) have groups that significantly exceed this limit, suggesting that these two species have been able to break through this fertility constraint. We suggest that they have done so by adopting a form of social substructuring that uses males as ‘hired guns’ to minimize the stresses of living in the unusually large groups required by high predation risk habitats.Description
| openaire: EC/H2020/295663/EU//RELNET
Keywords
bodyguard hypothesis, fertility, fission, predation risk, social organization
Other note
Citation
Dunbar, R I M & Mac Carron, P 2018, ' Does a trade-off between fertility and predation risk explain social evolution in baboons? ', JOURNAL OF ZOOLOGY, vol. 308, no. 1, pp. 9-15 . https://doi.org/10.1111/jzo.12644