A field investigation on the soil management practices in a productive vineyard considering C sequestration and water resistance of soil structure

dc.contributorAalto-yliopistofi
dc.contributorAalto Universityen
dc.contributor.authorŠimanský, Vladimír
dc.contributor.authorJonczak, Jerzy
dc.contributor.authorBordoloi, Sanandam
dc.contributor.authorHorák, Ján
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Civil Engineeringen
dc.contributor.groupauthorMineral Based Materials and Mechanicsen
dc.contributor.groupauthorStructures – Structural Engineering, Mechanics and Computationen
dc.contributor.organizationSlovak University of Agriculture in Nitra
dc.contributor.organizationWarsaw University of Life Sciences
dc.date.accessioned2025-04-30T07:32:19Z
dc.date.available2025-04-30T07:32:19Z
dc.date.issued2025-05
dc.descriptionPublisher Copyright: © The Author(s) 2024.
dc.description.abstractOptimal soil structure is linked to soil organic matter (SOM). Different soil management practice alternates SOM but the storing C to soil structure formation in vineyard soils is not sufficiently studied. In addition, understanding the impact of soil management practices in vineyard on changes in SOM and soil structure is crucial for sustainable viticulture. In this study conducted in a productive vineyard near Nitra city, Slovakia, we investigated the dynamics of individual size-fractions of water-stable aggregates (WSA) as results of changes in soil organic matter (SOM) under different soil management practices. Five distinct management practices – Intensive tillage system (T); Intensive tillage system with poultry manure (T + M); Strip grass (G); Fertilization in lower rates of NPK (NPK 1) to grass strips; and Fertilization in higher level of NPK (NPK 2) to grass strips were adopted to to be tested. The results have shown that the highest content of soil organic carbon (SOC) 20.3 ± 3.68 g kg−1, labile carbon (CL) 2.71 ± 0.78 g kg−1, and the most favor soil structure were identified in NPK 1, however, the most effectively improved soil structure and C sequestration (SOC: 19.9 ± 3.88 g kg−1; CL: 2.53 ± 0.83 g kg−1) was under G treatment. SOC had a more significant influence on the content of water-stable aggregates than CL. Intense changes in SOM took place in larger size-fractions of water-stable macroaggregates (WSAma) above 2 mm, while smaller WSAma below 2 mm and water-stable microaggregates were more stable.en
dc.description.versionPeer revieweden
dc.format.extent15
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.citationŠimanský, V, Jonczak, J, Bordoloi, S & Horák, J 2025, 'A field investigation on the soil management practices in a productive vineyard considering C sequestration and water resistance of soil structure', Biologia, vol. 80, no. 5, 105742, pp. 1169-1183. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11756-024-01676-8en
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s11756-024-01676-8
dc.identifier.issn0006-3088
dc.identifier.issn1336-9563
dc.identifier.otherPURE UUID: 9df3587a-a29a-4580-98d2-07c071f5d0e8
dc.identifier.otherPURE ITEMURL: https://research.aalto.fi/en/publications/9df3587a-a29a-4580-98d2-07c071f5d0e8
dc.identifier.otherPURE FILEURL: https://research.aalto.fi/files/180383836/s11756-024-01676-8-1.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttps://aaltodoc.aalto.fi/handle/123456789/135139
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:fi:aalto-202504303449
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherSpringer
dc.relation.ispartofseriesBiologiaen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesVolume 80, issue 5, pp. 1169-1183en
dc.rightsopenAccessen
dc.rightsCC BY
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subject.keywordLabile carbon
dc.subject.keywordNPK fertilization
dc.subject.keywordPoultry manure
dc.subject.keywordSoil organic carbon
dc.subject.keywordStrips grass
dc.subject.keywordWater-stable aggregates
dc.titleA field investigation on the soil management practices in a productive vineyard considering C sequestration and water resistance of soil structureen
dc.typeA1 Alkuperäisartikkeli tieteellisessä aikakauslehdessäfi
dc.type.versionpublishedVersion

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
s11756-024-01676-8-1.pdf
Size:
1.58 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format