Sustainable biobutanol production from pineapple waste by using Clostridium acetobutylicum B 527: Drying kinetics study
No Thumbnail Available
Access rights
openAccess
URL
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
A1 Alkuperäisartikkeli tieteellisessä aikakauslehdessä
This publication is imported from Aalto University research portal.
View publication in the Research portal (opens in new window)
View/Open full text file from the Research portal (opens in new window)
Other link related to publication (opens in new window)
View publication in the Research portal (opens in new window)
View/Open full text file from the Research portal (opens in new window)
Other link related to publication (opens in new window)
Date
2017
Major/Subject
Mcode
Degree programme
Language
en
Pages
359–366
Series
BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, Volume 225
Abstract
Present investigation explores the use of pineapple peel, a food industry waste, for acetone-butanol- ethanol (ABE) production using Clostridium acetobutylicum B 527. Proximate analysis of pineapple peel shows that it contains 35% cellulose, 19% hemicellulose, and 16% lignin on dry basis. Drying experiments on pineapple peel waste were carried out in the temperature range of 60–120 C and experimental drying data was modeled using moisture diffusion control model to study its effect on ABE production. The pro- duction of ABE was further accomplished via acid hydrolysis, detoxification, and fermentation process. Maximum total sugar release obtained by using acid hydrolysis was 97 g/L with 95–97% and 10–50% removal of phenolics and acetic acid, respectively during detoxification process. The maximum ABE titer obtained was 5.23 g/L with 55.6% substrate consumption when samples dried at 120 C were used as a substrate (after detoxification).Description
Keywords
Other note
Citation
Khedkar, M, Nimbalkar, P, Gaikwad, S, Chavan, P & Bankar, S 2017, ' Sustainable biobutanol production from pineapple waste by using Clostridium acetobutylicum B 527: Drying kinetics study ', Bioresource Technology, vol. 225, pp. 359–366 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2016.11.058