Capturing the micro-level of intermediation in transitions: Comparing ethnographic and interview methods

To date, a major portion of sustainability transition research has relied on retrospective methods to generate encompassing macro-level views of transitions. However, such methods may have considerable impacts on the insights generated in the study of intermediation, action and agency by actors on the micro-level of transitions. In this article, we compare retrospective interviews and real-time ethnography to understand how they portray micro-level transition processes and intermediation. The empirical context of our study is energy retrofitting, which we use to illustrate three structural and three process aspects that distinguish the findings from retrospective interviewing and real-time ethnography. Ethnographic methods can provide significant new detail on the uncertainty and complexity of micro-level transition processes while interviews facilitate cross-case comparison and understanding of commonalities in micro-level transition intermediation processes better.

Keywords

Intermediaries, Intermediation, Qualitative research, Research methods, Sustainability transition

DOI

10.1016/j.eist.2020.01.004

Citation

Murto, P, Hyysalo, S, Juntunen, J K & Jalas, M 2020, ' Capturing the micro-level of intermediation in transitions: Comparing ethnographic and interview methods ', Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, vol. 36, pp. 406-417 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2020.01.004

Permanent link to this item

https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi:aalto-2021121510739

Collections

[article-cris] Kauppakorkeakoulu / BIZ

Show all metadata

Capturing the micro-level of intermediation in transitions: Comparing ethnographic and interview methods

Access rights

URL

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Authors

Date

Department

Major/Subject

Mcode

Degree programme

Language

Pages

Series

Abstract

Description

Keywords

Other note

DOI

Citation

Permanent link to this item

Collections