What are the priorities of bureaucrats? Evidence from conjoint experiments with procurement officials
Loading...
Access rights
openAccess
URL
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
A1 Alkuperäisartikkeli tieteellisessä aikakauslehdessä
This publication is imported from Aalto University research portal.
View publication in the Research portal (opens in new window)
View/Open full text file from the Research portal (opens in new window)
Other link related to publication (opens in new window)
View publication in the Research portal (opens in new window)
View/Open full text file from the Research portal (opens in new window)
Other link related to publication (opens in new window)
Date
2024-11
Department
School Common, BIZ
Department of Economics
Department of Economics
Major/Subject
Mcode
Degree programme
Language
en
Pages
18
Series
Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, Volume 227, pp. 1-18
Abstract
While effective bureaucracy is crucial for state capacity, its decision-making remains a black box. We elicit preferences of 900+ real-world public procurement officials in Finland and Germany. This is an important pursuit as they report having sizeable discretion and minimal extrinsic incentives. Through conjoint experiments, we identify the relative importance of multiple features of procurement outcomes. Officials prioritize avoiding unexpectedly high prices over seeking low prices. Avoiding winners with prior bad performance is the most important feature. Officials avoid very low competition, while litigation risks and regional favoritism matter less. Preferences and office interests appear well-aligned among bureaucrats.Description
Publisher Copyright: © 2024 The Author(s)
Keywords
Bureaucrats, Conjoint experiments, Preferences, Public procurement
Other note
Citation
Tukiainen, J, Blesse, S, Bohne, A, Giuffrida, L M, Jääskeläinen, J, Luukinen, A & Sieppi, A 2024, ' What are the priorities of bureaucrats? Evidence from conjoint experiments with procurement officials ', Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, vol. 227, 106716, pp. 1-18 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2024.106716