How much upfront-embodied GHG emissions can wooden buildings save-displacement factors for wooden buildings
Loading...
Access rights
openAccess
CC BY
CC BY
publishedVersion
URL
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
A1 Alkuperäisartikkeli tieteellisessä aikakauslehdessä
This publication is imported from Aalto University research portal.
View publication in the Research portal (opens in new window)
View/Open full text file from the Research portal (opens in new window)
Other link related to publication (opens in new window)
View publication in the Research portal (opens in new window)
View/Open full text file from the Research portal (opens in new window)
Other link related to publication (opens in new window)
Unless otherwise stated, all rights belong to the author. You may download, display and print this publication for Your own personal use. Commercial use is prohibited.
Authors
Date
Department
Major/Subject
Mcode
Degree programme
Language
en
Pages
16
Series
Environmental Research: Infrastructure and Sustainability, Volume 5, issue 2
Abstract
Wood can be a reasonable building material replacement for major greenhouse gas (GHG)-emission sources, such as concrete, steel, and masonry. Here, we conduct a detailed evaluation of the upfront-embodied GHG (UE-GHG) emissions benefits of wood compared with the other construction materials. By using lifecycle assessment (LCA) data from 92 case buildings in the literature, we provide an extensive synthesis of the displacement factor (DF) for wooden buildings. We use DF as a reference number for comparable building LCA studies to understand the GHG-emission benefits of wooden buildings. A pattern of lower UE-GHG emissions was found in our study; on average, the wooden buildings showed approximately 23% lower UE-GHG emissions than their non-wooden counterparts. Generally, low-rise (especially detached) buildings were found to have better DF values compared to mid-to-high-rise buildings. In addition, the process-specific LCA study found higher DF values for wooden buildings compared with input–output LCA studies that mostly base their calculations on average material manufacturing data. Finally, it is important to note that the DF values of different case buildings ranged from −0.15 to 0.69, which highlights the importance of careful technical considerations and efficient design of wooden buildings in order to maximize their DF benefits. We highlight the emergence of hybrid (structure) wooden buildings, especially for mid- to high-rise buildings, in recent years and emphasize the urgent need for a hybrid building definition because current practice allows the branding of low-wood-content buildings as wooden buildings.Description
Other note
Citation
Amiri, A & Junnila, S 2025, 'How much upfront-embodied GHG emissions can wooden buildings save-displacement factors for wooden buildings', Environmental Research: Infrastructure and Sustainability, vol. 5, no. 2, 025012. https://doi.org/10.1088/2634-4505/addc16