An Improved Guillotine Cut for Squares
Loading...
Access rights
openAccess
CC BY
CC BY
publishedVersion
URL
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
A4 Artikkeli konferenssijulkaisussa
This publication is imported from Aalto University research portal.
View publication in the Research portal (opens in new window)
View/Open full text file from the Research portal (opens in new window)
View publication in the Research portal (opens in new window)
View/Open full text file from the Research portal (opens in new window)
Unless otherwise stated, all rights belong to the author. You may download, display and print this publication for Your own personal use. Commercial use is prohibited.
Date
Department
Major/Subject
Mcode
Degree programme
Language
en
Pages
Series
19th International Symposium on Algorithms and Data Structures, WADS 2025, Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics, LIPIcs ; Volume 349
Abstract
Given a set of n non-overlapping geometric objects, can we separate a constant fraction of them using straight-line cuts that extend from edge to edge? In 1996, Urrutia posed this question for compact convex objects. Pach and Tardos later refuted it for general line segments by constructing a family where any separable subfamily has size at most O (nlog3 2). However, for axis-parallel rectangles, they provided positive evidence, showing that an Ω(1/ log n)-fraction can be separated. This problem naturally arises in geometric approximation algorithms. In particular, when restricting cuts to only orthogonal straight lines, known as a guillotine cut sequence, any bound on the separability ratio directly translates into a clean and simple dynamic programming for computing a maximum independent set of geometric objects. This paper focuses on the case when the objects are squares. For squares of arbitrary sizes, an Ω(1)-fraction can be separated (Abed et al., APPROX 2015), recently improved to 1/40 (and 1/160 ≈ 0.62% for the weighted case) (Khan and Pittu, APPROX 2020). We further improve this bound, showing that a 9/256 ≈ 3.51% can be separated for the weighted case. This result significantly narrows the possible range for squares to [3.51%, 50%]. The key to our improvement is a refined analysis of the existing framework.Description
Publisher Copyright: © Parinya Chalermsook, Axel Kugelmann, Ly Orgo, Sumedha Uniyal, and Minoo Zarsav. | openaire: EC/H2020/759557/EU//ALGOCom
Other note
Citation
Chalermsook, P, Kugelmann, A, Orgo, L, Uniyal, S & Zarsav, M 2025, An Improved Guillotine Cut for Squares. in P Morin & E Oh (eds), 19th International Symposium on Algorithms and Data Structures, WADS 2025., 16, Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics, LIPIcs, vol. 349, Schloss Dagstuhl - Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik, International Symposium on Algorithms and Data Structures, Toronto, Canada, 11/08/2025. https://doi.org/10.4230/LIPIcs.WADS.2025.16