Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Blood Oxygenation Level-Dependent Signal and Magnetoencephalography Evoked Responses Yield Different Neural Functionality in Reading
Loading...
Access rights
© 2011 Authors. This article has been published in The Journal of Neuroscience under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) license
URL
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
School of Science |
A1 Alkuperäisartikkeli tieteellisessä aikakauslehdessä
Unless otherwise stated, all rights belong to the author. You may download, display and print this publication for Your own personal use. Commercial use is prohibited.
Date
2011
Major/Subject
Mcode
Degree programme
Language
en
Pages
1048-1058
Series
Journal of Neuroscience, Volume 31, Issue 3
Abstract
It is often implicitly assumed that the neural activation patterns revealed by hemodynamic methods, such as functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), and electrophysiological methods, such as magnetoencephalography (MEG) and electroencephalography (EEG), are comparable. In early sensory processing that seems to be the case, but the assumption may not be correct in high-level cognitive tasks. For example, MEG and fMRI literature of single-word reading suggests differences in cortical activation, but direct comparisons are lacking. Here, while the same human participants performed the same reading task, analysis of MEG evoked responses and fMRI blood oxygenation level-dependent (BOLD) signals revealed marked functional and spatial differences in several cortical areas outside the visual cortex. Divergent patterns of activation were observed in the frontal and temporal cortex, in accordance with previous separate MEG and fMRI studies of reading. Furthermore, opposite stimulus effects in the MEG and fMRI measures were detected in the left occipitotemporal cortex: MEG evoked responses were stronger to letter than symbol strings, whereas the fMRI BOLD signal was stronger to symbol than letter strings. The EEG recorded simultaneously during MEG and fMRI did not indicate neurophysiological differences that could explain the observed functional discrepancies between the MEG and fMRI results. Acknowledgment of the complementary nature of hemodynamic and electrophysiological measures, as reported here in a cognitive task using evoked response analysis in MEG and BOLD signal analysis in fMRI, represents an essential step toward an informed use of multimodal imaging that reaches beyond mere combination of location and timing of neural activationDescription
Keywords
letter-string perception, word form area, gamma- oscillations, cortical activity, visual-cortex, fMRI, EEG, MEG
Other note
Citation
Vartiainen, J. & Liljestrom, M. & Koskinen, M. & Renvall, H. & Salmelin, Riitta. 2011. Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Blood Oxygenation Level-Dependent Signal and Magnetoencephalography Evoked Responses Yield Different Neural Functionality in Reading. Journal of Neuroscience. Volume 31, Issue 3. P. 1048-1058. ISSN 0270-6474 (printed). DOI: 10.1523/jneurosci.3113-10.2011.