aalto1 untyped-item.component.html

Comparative evaluation of the Ioncell® and Lyocell process for cotton textile waste recycling

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

URL

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

School of Chemical Engineering | Master's thesis

Department

Mcode

Language

en

Pages

55

Series

Abstract

With growing environmental concerns over the dominance of fossil-based synthetic fibers and the high impacts of cotton production, the expanding textile industry faces increasing pressure to transition toward renewable, low-impact alternatives. Recycling post-industrial cotton waste (COr) into regenerated fibers offers a promising path forward. This study compares the Ioncell® and Lyocell processes for this purpose, focusing on cellulose dissolution, spinning performance, fiber quality, and degradation behaviour. While Lyocell employs N-methylmorpholine N-oxide (NMMO) as a solvent it is limited by thermal instability and degradation. Ioncell® relies on ionic liquids, with 7-methyl-1,5,7-triazabicyclo[4.4.0]dec-5-enium acetate ([mTBDH][OAc]) used in this work as a more stable alternative. The spinning temperatures employed for Ioncell® and Lyocell were 65-70 °C and 75-80 °C respectively. Ioncell® fibers exhibited greater tenacity (58.35 cN/tex) and orientation, whereas Lyocell fibers showed lower tenacity (47.14 cN/tex) but higher elongation at break (12.34% vs. 8.39%). Thermal degradation analysis identified glycolic acid in NMMO-COr and lactic acid in [mTBDH][OAc]-COr solutions. While cellulose recovery was higher in the NMMO system, molar mass degradation was more pronounced. H-mTBD, a degradation product of [mTBDH][OAc], was identified at 90 °C in concentrations up to 2 mol%. These results highlight the differences and support Ioncell®’s potential for sustainable fiber production from cotton waste.

Description

Supervisor

Hummel, Michael

Thesis advisor

Sixta, Herbert
Schlapp-Hackl, Inge

Other note

Citation

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Referenced By