Proudly Elitist and Undemocratic? The distributed maintenance of contested practices
Loading...
Access rights
openAccess
publishedVersion
URL
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
A1 Alkuperäisartikkeli tieteellisessä aikakauslehdessä
This publication is imported from Aalto University research portal.
View publication in the Research portal (opens in new window)
View/Open full text file from the Research portal (opens in new window)
View publication in the Research portal (opens in new window)
View/Open full text file from the Research portal (opens in new window)
Date
Department
Major/Subject
Mcode
Degree programme
Language
en
Pages
27
Series
Organization Studies, Volume 42, issue 1, pp. 7-33
Abstract
This study examines the maintenance of highly institutionalized practices during periods of vehement contestation and changing external demands. Employing a cross-level longitudinal research design, we explore how the recruitment model of elite French business schools persisted, remaining fundamentally intact despite serious questions raised about its functional utility and social legitimacy. Comparing three periods of contestation, we document shifting coalitions of dispersed actors that were incentivized to ?thematically? maintain the practices in the focal field with little formal orchestration. Our findings indicate that practices which contribute to social stratification often foster meta-routines that cajole constituencies in multiple fields to, collectively and self-interestedly, promote and regulate conservative change. We identify three meta-routines?referential comparison, generative improvisation, and distributed monitoring and policing?that introduced flexibility and encouraged ?unforced? adaptations. In elaborating these meta-routines, we contribute to extant theory on the mechanisms of institutional maintenance, and shed further light on the role of complex embeddedness as a constraint on institutional processes.Description
doi: 10.1177/0170840619874462
Other note
Citation
Raynard, M, Kodeih, F & Greenwood, R 2021, 'Proudly Elitist and Undemocratic? The distributed maintenance of contested practices', Organization Studies, vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 7-33. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840619874462