aalto1 untyped-item.component.html
On the difficulty of using algorithms to replace managers in decision making: A study of customer prioritization
Loading...
Access rights
openAccess
CC BY
CC BY
Creative Commons license
Except where otherwised noted, this item's license is described as openAccess
publishedVersion
URL
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
A1 Alkuperäisartikkeli tieteellisessä aikakauslehdessä
This publication is imported from Aalto University research portal.
View publication in the Research portal (opens in new window)
View/Open full text file from the Research portal (opens in new window)
View publication in the Research portal (opens in new window)
View/Open full text file from the Research portal (opens in new window)
Unless otherwise stated, all rights belong to the author. You may download, display and print this publication for Your own personal use. Commercial use is prohibited.
Authors
Date
Major/Subject
Mcode
Degree programme
Language
en
Pages
22
Series
Industrial Marketing Management, Volume 134, pp. 198-219
Abstract
Existing research in business-to-business (B2B) marketing predominantly assumes that algorithms will outperform managers in decision making due to their capacity to process vast information and propose novel decision-making approaches. However, the tangible benefits of algorithms in real organizational contexts often fall short of these expectations. Using data from a customer prioritization initiative in a large industrial company, this study compares managerial and algorithmic decision making by combining statistical modeling, machine learning and counterfactual analysis. We find that despite satisfactory technical performance, algorithmic prioritization did not unambiguously outperform human decision makers. We interpret this not as a technical failure, but as the result of the effectiveness of managerial prioritization and the importance of algorithm-organization fit. Drawing insights from our modeling and the behavioral theory of the firm, we propose three interdependent elements that condition the benefits of algorithmic decision making: the pre-existing managerial decision-making logic, the repertoire of preferential treatment actions, and the customer base structure. We theorize that these elements can create a systemic lock-in that limits the value of algorithmic decision making. Our study contributes to the B2B marketing and algorithmic management literatures by shifting the focus from technical accuracy to the structural alignment required to capture value from algorithms in established sales organizations.
Description
Publisher Copyright: © 2026 The Authors.
Other note
Citation
Ahola, S & Luoma, J 2026, 'On the difficulty of using algorithms to replace managers in decision making: A study of customer prioritization', Industrial Marketing Management, vol. 134, pp. 198-219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2026.02.016