Counterfactual Thinking: What Theories Do in Design
Loading...
Access rights
openAccess
URL
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
A1 Alkuperäisartikkeli tieteellisessä aikakauslehdessä
This publication is imported from Aalto University research portal.
View publication in the Research portal (opens in new window)
View/Open full text file from the Research portal (opens in new window)
Other link related to publication (opens in new window)
View publication in the Research portal (opens in new window)
View/Open full text file from the Research portal (opens in new window)
Other link related to publication (opens in new window)
Authors
Date
2022
Major/Subject
Mcode
Degree programme
Language
en
Pages
15
78-92
78-92
Series
International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, Volume 38, issue 1
Abstract
This essay addresses a foundational topic in applied sciences with interest in design: how do theories inform design? Previous work has attributed theory-use to abduction and deduction. However, design is about creating an intervention, a possible state that does not exist presently, and these accounts fail to explain how theories permit taking this leap. We argue that the practical value of a theory lies in counterfactual thinking. Theories are like “speculation pumps”: they produce (pump) counterfactual thought experiments of the type: If design was <like this>, then interaction would be <like that>. The more valid these thought experiments are and the better they direct the solution of design problems toward desirable and reliable outcomes, the more useful the theory. Counterfactual thinking sheds new light to design methods and, importantly, can reconcile an underlying tension between design sciences and applied sciences.Description
Publisher Copyright: © 2021 The Author(s). Published with license by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC. Tallenna OA-artikkeli, kun julkaistu / KS
Keywords
Other note
Citation
Oulasvirta , A & Hornbæk , K 2022 , ' Counterfactual Thinking: What Theories Do in Design ' , International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction , vol. 38 , no. 1 , pp. 78-92 . https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2021.1925436