Comparing MEG and EEG measurement set-ups for a brain-computer interface based on selective auditory attention

dc.contributorAalto-yliopistofi
dc.contributorAalto Universityen
dc.contributor.authorKurmanavičiūtė, Dovilė
dc.contributor.authorKataja, Hanna
dc.contributor.authorParkkonen, Lauri
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Neuroscience and Biomedical Engineeringen
dc.contributor.organizationAalto University
dc.date.accessioned2025-04-30T07:37:39Z
dc.date.available2025-04-30T07:37:39Z
dc.date.issued2025-04
dc.descriptionPublisher Copyright: © 2025 Kurmanavičiūtė et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
dc.description.abstractAuditory attention modulates auditory evoked responses to target vs. non-target sounds in electro- and magnetoencephalographic (EEG/MEG) recordings. Employing whole-scalp MEG recordings and offline classification algorithms has been shown to enable high accuracy in tracking the target of auditory attention. Here, we investigated the decrease in accuracy when moving from the whole-scalp MEG to lower channel count EEG recordings and when training the classifier only from the initial or middle part of the recording instead of extracting training trials throughout the recording. To this end, we recorded simultaneous MEG (306 channels) and EEG (64 channels) in 18 healthy volunteers while presented with concurrent streams of spoken “Yes”/“No” words and instructed to attend to one of them. We then trained support vector machine classifiers to predict the target of attention from unaveraged trials of MEG/EEG. Classifiers were trained on 204 MEG gradiometers or on EEG with 64, 30, nine or three channels with trials extracted randomly across or only from the beginning of the recording. The highest classification accuracy, 73.2% on average across the participants for one-second trials, was obtained with MEG when the training trials were randomly extracted throughout the recording. With EEG, the accuracy was 69%, 69%, 66%, and 61% when using 64, 30, nine, and three channels, respectively. When training the classifiers with the same amount of data but extracted only from the beginning of the recording, the accuracy dropped by 11%-units on average, causing the result from the three-channel EEG to fall below the chance level. The combination of five consecutive trials partially compensated for this drop such that it was one to 5%-units. Although moving from whole-scalp MEG to EEG reduces classification accuracy, usable auditory-attention-based brain-computer interfaces can be implemented with a small set of optimally placed EEG channels.en
dc.description.versionPeer revieweden
dc.format.extent12
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.citationKurmanavičiūtė, D, Kataja, H & Parkkonen, L 2025, 'Comparing MEG and EEG measurement set-ups for a brain-computer interface based on selective auditory attention', PloS One, vol. 20, no. 4 April, e0319328, pp. 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0319328en
dc.identifier.doi10.1371/journal.pone.0319328
dc.identifier.issn1932-6203
dc.identifier.otherPURE UUID: f61f185b-e25f-482d-ab90-d072d6d2c5c3
dc.identifier.otherPURE ITEMURL: https://research.aalto.fi/en/publications/f61f185b-e25f-482d-ab90-d072d6d2c5c3
dc.identifier.otherPURE FILEURL: https://research.aalto.fi/files/179865310/Comparing_MEG_and_EEG_measurement_set-ups_for_a_brain_computer_interface_based_on_selective_auditory_attention.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttps://aaltodoc.aalto.fi/handle/123456789/135171
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:fi:aalto-202504303481
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherPublic Library of Science
dc.relation.fundinginfoThis study was funded by grants to LP from the Research Council of Finland (#293553) and the European Research Council (#678578).
dc.relation.ispartofseriesPloS Oneen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesVolume 20, issue 4 April, pp. 1-12en
dc.rightsopenAccessen
dc.rightsCC BY
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.titleComparing MEG and EEG measurement set-ups for a brain-computer interface based on selective auditory attentionen
dc.typeA1 Alkuperäisartikkeli tieteellisessä aikakauslehdessäfi
dc.type.versionpublishedVersion

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Comparing_MEG_and_EEG_measurement_set-ups_for_a_brain_computer_interface_based_on_selective_auditory_attention.pdf
Size:
1.75 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format