User journey method : a case study for improving digital intervention use measurement
Loading...
Access rights
openAccess
CC BY-NC-ND
CC BY-NC-ND
publishedVersion
URL
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
A1 Alkuperäisartikkeli tieteellisessä aikakauslehdessä
This publication is imported from Aalto University research portal.
View publication in the Research portal (opens in new window)
View/Open full text file from the Research portal (opens in new window)
Other link related to publication (opens in new window)
View publication in the Research portal (opens in new window)
View/Open full text file from the Research portal (opens in new window)
Other link related to publication (opens in new window)
Unless otherwise stated, all rights belong to the author. You may download, display and print this publication for Your own personal use. Commercial use is prohibited.
Date
2025-12
Major/Subject
Mcode
Degree programme
Language
en
Pages
15
Series
BMC Health Services Research, Volume 25, issue 1, pp. 1-15
Abstract
Background: Many digital mental health interventions meet low levels of use. However, current use measurement methods do not necessarily help identify which intervention elements are associated with dropout, despite this information potentially facilitating iterative intervention development. Here, we suggest improving the comprehensiveness of intervention use measurement with the user journey method, which evaluates every intervention element to identify intervention-specific use barriers. Methods: We applied user journey method in a clinical trial that investigated the efficacy of a novel game-based intervention, Meliora, for adult Major Depressive Disorder. We modelled the intervention for its four technological (Recruitment, Website, Questionnaires, Intervention Software) and two interpersonal elements (Assessment, Support). We then applied the user journey method to measure how many users proceeded from one element to the next combining social media analytics, website use data, signup data, clinical subject coordinator interview data, symptom questionnaire data, and behavioral intervention use data. These measurements were complemented with the qualitative analysis of the study discovery sources and email support contacts. Results: Recruitment: The intervention recruitment reached at least 145,000 Finns, with social media, word-of-mouth, and news and web sources being the most effective recruitment channels. Website: The study website received 16,243 visitors, which led to 1,007 sign-ups. Assessment: 895 participants were assessed and 735 were accepted. Intervention Software: 498 participants were assigned to the active intervention or comparator, of whom 457 used them at least once: on average, for 17.3 h (SD = 20.4 h) on 19.7 days (SD = 20.7 d) over a period of 38.9 days (SD = 31.2 d). The 28 intervention levels were associated with an average dropout rate of 2.6%, with two sections exhibiting an increase against this baseline. 150 participants met the minimum adherence goal of 24 h use. Questionnaires: 116 participants completed the post-intervention questionnaire. Support: 313 signed-up participants contacted the researchers via email. Conclusion: The user journey method allowed for the comprehensive evaluation of the six intervention elements, and enabled identifying use barriers expediting iterative intervention development and implementation. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05426265. Registered 28 June 2022, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05426265.Description
Publisher Copyright: © The Author(s) 2025.
Keywords
Acceptability, Depression, Digital interventions, Engagement, Evaluation methods, Implementation, Mental health, Mixed methods, Use data, User-centered design
Other note
Citation
Lukka, L, Vesterinen, M, Salonen, A, Bergman, V R, Torkki, P, Palva, S & Palva, J M 2025, 'User journey method : a case study for improving digital intervention use measurement', BMC Health Services Research, vol. 25, no. 1, 479, pp. 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-025-12641-9