Being as Having, Loving, and Doing : A Theory of Human Well-Being

dc.contributorAalto-yliopistofi
dc.contributorAalto Universityen
dc.contributor.authorMartela, Franken_US
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Industrial Engineering and Managementen
dc.date.accessioned2024-11-06T06:18:53Z
dc.date.available2024-11-06T06:18:53Z
dc.date.issued2024-11en_US
dc.descriptionPublisher Copyright: © Author(s) 2024.
dc.description.abstractAcademic Abstract: Stronger theory on the nature of human well-being is needed, especially as well-being indicators are increasingly utilized in policy contexts. Building on Erik Allardt, who argued that a theory of well-being is, in essence, a theory of human nature, I propose four modes of existence each capturing one dimension central to human well-being: Having recognizes humans as biological creatures requiring certain material resources for survival. Loving captures human social nature and our dependence on others for well-being. Doing highlights the active and agentic nature of human existence. Being acknowledges humans as experiencing their existence. Each mode of existence gives rise to a few more specific needs, and a full assessment of human well-being requires both subjective and objective indicators tapping into these needs. The proposed theory integrates psychological well-being research with sociological and philosophical traditions and contributes to debates about how the progress of nations and sustainability should be measured. Public Abstract: Well-being is something we all value individually, and it is also a key political goal. Accordingly, how we define and measure well-being influences what physicians, managers, policy-makers, politicians, and international organizations aim to improve through their work. Better theories of well-being make better measurement of well-being possible, which makes possible more effective and evidence-based advancement of human well-being. In this spirit, the present article argues that there are four fundamental dimensions to human well-being: Having highlights that as biological creatures, we have physical needs, loving highlights human social needs, doing highlights that we are active and agentic beings with goals and strivings, and being highlights that we feel and evaluate our lives. To assess well-being, we need measures tapping into all four of these dimensions. And to assess the sustainability of well-being, we need to examine how to provide well-being for all humanity while remaining within planetary boundaries.en
dc.description.versionPeer revieweden
dc.format.extent26
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen_US
dc.identifier.citationMartela, F 2024, 'Being as Having, Loving, and Doing : A Theory of Human Well-Being', Personality and Social Psychology Review, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 372-397. https://doi.org/10.1177/10888683241263634en
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/10888683241263634en_US
dc.identifier.issn1088-8683
dc.identifier.issn1532-7957
dc.identifier.otherPURE UUID: 4a2346eb-b2b8-4b7d-94a5-5a42fbd2506aen_US
dc.identifier.otherPURE ITEMURL: https://research.aalto.fi/en/publications/4a2346eb-b2b8-4b7d-94a5-5a42fbd2506aen_US
dc.identifier.otherPURE FILEURL: https://research.aalto.fi/files/163359887/Being_as_Having_Loving_and_Doing_-_A_Theory_of_Human_Well-Being.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttps://aaltodoc.aalto.fi/handle/123456789/131513
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:fi:aalto-202411067029
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherSage Publishing
dc.relation.ispartofseriesPersonality and Social Psychology Reviewen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesVolume 28, issue 4, pp. 372-397en
dc.rightsopenAccessen
dc.subject.keywordErik Allardten_US
dc.subject.keywordeudaimonic well-beingen_US
dc.subject.keywordphysical needsen_US
dc.subject.keywordpsychological needsen_US
dc.subject.keywordself-determination theoryen_US
dc.subject.keywordsubjective well-beingen_US
dc.subject.keywordwell-beingen_US
dc.titleBeing as Having, Loving, and Doing : A Theory of Human Well-Beingen
dc.typeA1 Alkuperäisartikkeli tieteellisessä aikakauslehdessäfi
dc.type.versionpublishedVersion

Files