Exploring the configuration space of elemental carbon with empirical and machine learned interatomic potentials

dc.contributorAalto-yliopistofi
dc.contributorAalto Universityen
dc.contributor.authorMarchant, George A.
dc.contributor.authorCaro, Miguel A.
dc.contributor.authorKarasulu, Bora
dc.contributor.authorPártay, Livia B.
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Chemistry and Materials Scienceen
dc.contributor.groupauthorDAS Groupen
dc.contributor.organizationUniversity of Warwick
dc.date.accessioned2023-08-30T04:20:52Z
dc.date.available2023-08-30T04:20:52Z
dc.date.issued2023-07-27
dc.descriptionFunding Information: The authors thank Nigel Marks for providing access to the carbon EDIP. The authors also thank Albert P. Bartók, Gábor Csányi and Volker Deringer for useful discussions around the performance of the GAP-20 model. L.B.P. and B.K. acknowledge support from the EPSRC through the individual Early Career Fellowships (LBP: EP/T000163/1 and BK: EP/T026138/1). M.A.C. acknowledges personal funding from the Academy of Finland, under project #330488. Computing facilities were provided by the Scientific Computing Research Technology Platform of the University of Warwick. Calculations using the GAP potential were performed using the Sulis Tier 2 HPC platform hosted by the Scientific Computing Research Technology Platform at the University of Warwick. Sulis is funded by EPSRC Grant EP/T022108/1 and the HPC Midlands+ consortium.
dc.description.abstractWe demonstrate how the many-body potential energy landscape of carbon can be explored with the nested sampling algorithm, allowing for the calculation of its pressure-temperature phase diagram. We compare four interatomic potential models: Tersoff, EDIP, GAP-20 and its recently updated version, GAP-20U. Our evaluation is focused on their macroscopic properties, melting transitions, and identifying thermodynamically stable solid structures up to at least 100 GPa. The phase diagrams of the GAP models show good agreement with experimental results. However, we find that the models’ description of graphite includes thermodynamically stable phases with incorrect layer spacing. By adding a suitable selection of structures to the database and re-training the potential, we have derived an improved model — GAP-20U+gr — that suppresses erroneous local minima in the graphitic energy landscape. At extreme high pressure nested sampling identifies two novel stable structures in the GAP-20 model, however, the stability of these is not confirmed by electronic structure calculations, highlighting routes to further extend the applicability of the GAP models.en
dc.description.versionPeer revieweden
dc.format.extent12
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.citationMarchant, G A, Caro, M A, Karasulu, B & Pártay, L B 2023, 'Exploring the configuration space of elemental carbon with empirical and machine learned interatomic potentials', npj Computational Materials, vol. 9, no. 1, 131. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41524-023-01081-wen
dc.identifier.doi10.1038/s41524-023-01081-w
dc.identifier.issn2057-3960
dc.identifier.otherPURE UUID: 70fb2e1b-e152-4660-8b94-62a7b6c25d6b
dc.identifier.otherPURE ITEMURL: https://research.aalto.fi/en/publications/70fb2e1b-e152-4660-8b94-62a7b6c25d6b
dc.identifier.otherPURE FILEURL: https://research.aalto.fi/files/119690103/CHEM_Marchant_et_al_Exploring_the_configuration_2023_npj_Computational_Materials.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttps://aaltodoc.aalto.fi/handle/123456789/122979
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:fi:aalto-202308305319
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherNature Publishing Group
dc.relation.fundinginfoThe authors thank Nigel Marks for providing access to the carbon EDIP. The authors also thank Albert P. Bartók, Gábor Csányi and Volker Deringer for useful discussions around the performance of the GAP-20 model. L.B.P. and B.K. acknowledge support from the EPSRC through the individual Early Career Fellowships (LBP: EP/T000163/1 and BK: EP/T026138/1). M.A.C. acknowledges personal funding from the Academy of Finland, under project #330488. Computing facilities were provided by the Scientific Computing Research Technology Platform of the University of Warwick. Calculations using the GAP potential were performed using the Sulis Tier 2 HPC platform hosted by the Scientific Computing Research Technology Platform at the University of Warwick. Sulis is funded by EPSRC Grant EP/T022108/1 and the HPC Midlands+ consortium. The authors thank Nigel Marks for providing access to the carbon EDIP. The authors also thank Albert P. Bartók, Gábor Csányi and Volker Deringer for useful discussions around the performance of the GAP-20 model. L.B.P. and B.K. acknowledge support from the EPSRC through the individual Early Career Fellowships (LBP: EP/T000163/1 and BK: EP/T026138/1). M.A.C. acknowledges personal funding from the Academy of Finland, under project #330488. Computing facilities were provided by the Scientific Computing Research Technology Platform of the University of Warwick. Calculations using the GAP potential were performed using the Sulis Tier 2 HPC platform hosted by the Scientific Computing Research Technology Platform at the University of Warwick. Sulis is funded by EPSRC Grant EP/T022108/1 and the HPC Midlands+ consortium.
dc.relation.ispartofseriesnpj Computational Materialsen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesVolume 9, issue 1en
dc.rightsopenAccessen
dc.titleExploring the configuration space of elemental carbon with empirical and machine learned interatomic potentialsen
dc.typeA1 Alkuperäisartikkeli tieteellisessä aikakauslehdessäfi
dc.type.versionpublishedVersion

Files