Computer Vision-Enabled Construction Waste Sorting : A Sensitivity Analysis
Loading...
Access rights
openAccess
CC BY
CC BY
publishedVersion
URL
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
A1 Alkuperäisartikkeli tieteellisessä aikakauslehdessä
This publication is imported from Aalto University research portal.
View publication in the Research portal (opens in new window)
View/Open full text file from the Research portal (opens in new window)
View publication in the Research portal (opens in new window)
View/Open full text file from the Research portal (opens in new window)
Unless otherwise stated, all rights belong to the author. You may download, display and print this publication for Your own personal use. Commercial use is prohibited.
Date
Major/Subject
Mcode
Degree programme
Language
en
Pages
20
Series
Applied Sciences, Volume 15, issue 19, pp. 1-20
Abstract
This paper presents a comprehensive sensitivity analysis of the pioneering real-world deployment of computer vision-enabled construction waste sorting in Finland, implemented by a leading provider of robotic recycling solutions. Building upon and extending the findings of prior field research, the study analyzes an industry flagship case to examine the financial feasibility of computer vision-enabled robotic sorting compared to conventional sorting. The sensitivity analysis covers cost parameters related to labor, wages, personnel training, machinery (including AI software, hardware, and associated components), and maintenance operations, as well as capital expenses. We further expand the existing cost model by integrating the net present value (NPV) of investments. The results indicate that the computer vision-enabled automated system (CVAS) achieves cost competitiveness over conventional sorting (CS) under conditions of higher labor-related costs, such as increased headcount, wages, and training expenses. For instance, when annual wages exceed EUR 20,980, CVAS becomes more cost-effective. Conversely, CS retains cost advantages in scenarios dominated by higher machinery and maintenance costs or extremely elevated discount rates. For example, when the average machinery cost surpasses EUR 512,000 per unit, CS demonstrates greater economic viability. The novelty of this work arises from the use of a pioneering real-world case study and the improvements offered to a comprehensive comparative cost model for CVAS and CS, and furthermore from clarification of the impact of key cost variables on solution (CVAS or CS) selection.Description
Publisher Copyright: © 2025 by the authors.
Other note
Citation
Liu, X, Farshadfar, Z & Khajavi, S H 2025, 'Computer Vision-Enabled Construction Waste Sorting : A Sensitivity Analysis', Applied Sciences, vol. 15, no. 19, 10550, pp. 1-20. https://doi.org/10.3390/app151910550