A critical analysis of two recent ambiguity models
No Thumbnail Available
URL
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
School of Business |
Master's thesis
Ask about the availability of the thesis by sending email to the Aalto University Learning Centre oppimiskeskus@aalto.fi
Authors
Date
2014
Major/Subject
Economics
Kansantaloustiede
Kansantaloustiede
Mcode
Degree programme
Language
en
Pages
79
Series
Abstract
This thesis studies expected uncertain utility theory (EUU) (Gul & Pesendorfer, 2014)and uncertainty averse preferences (UAP) (Cerreia-Vioglio et al., 2011). First, different historical models of ambiguity are presented and their proofs sketched. Second, EUU and UAP are analyzed in detail and their utility representation theorems are sketched. Third, UAP's insight into the smooth ambiguity model and its extension with Bewley preferences are presented; additionally, by using this extension, the similarity of EUU and UAP is discussed. Fourth, counterintuitive predictions are shown for EUU and the author's solution attempt for these is discussed. Moreover, EUU is shown to break the connectivity principle since SEU is not a special case of EUU. Fifth, Machina's (2009) reflection example for UAP is presented, and the class of preferences that UAP characterizes is shown to be limited. Finally, differences between the Savage and Anscombe-Aumann frameworks are discussed.Description
Keywords
ambiguity; Ellsberg paradox; uncertainty averse preferences; expected uncertain utility theory