The multi-level nature of spatial planning and territorial governance

dc.contributorAalto-yliopistofi
dc.contributorAalto Universityen
dc.contributor.authorZonneveld, Wilen_US
dc.contributor.authorStead, Dominicen_US
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Built Environmenten
dc.contributor.editorNadin, Vincenten_US
dc.contributor.editorCotella, Giancarloen_US
dc.contributor.editorSchmitt, Peteren_US
dc.contributor.groupauthorPlanning and Transportationen
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-21T07:37:33Z
dc.date.available2024-08-21T07:37:33Z
dc.date.embargoinfo:eu-repo/date/embargoEnd/2024-11-16en_US
dc.date.issued2024-05-16en_US
dc.description.abstractCompetence for planning usually rests with more than one level of government in a country which creates multi-scalar or multi-level governance for spatial planning. The majority of the 32 countries in the ESPON COMPASS study had three levels of government, though some have two or four. The distribution of competences differs and there is much change which often involves the abolition or creation of administrations. There are several trends underway: decentralisation or devolution of competences, for example, in Germany and Croatia; regionalisation where there is devolution to sub-national governments, for example, in the UK and in some ways Greece; and concurrent centralisation and decentralisation, for example, in Denmark and Lithuania. Most countries have some competence for national-level responsibilities for planning, even in federal states where the competent bodies are at sub-national level there is cooperation on some issues for the whole country. Spatial planning across functional regions or soft territorial cooperation areas is increasing, most commonly in metropolitan regions, where there are varied arrangements including the creation of metropolitan-level administrations, inter-municipal agreements and voluntary cooperation.en
dc.description.versionPeer revieweden
dc.format.extent20
dc.identifier.citationZonneveld, W & Stead, D 2024, The multi-level nature of spatial planning and territorial governance . in V Nadin, G Cotella & P Schmitt (eds), Spatial Planning Systems in Europe: Comparison and Trajectories . Edward Elgar, pp. 87-106 . https://doi.org/10.4337/9781839106255.00015en
dc.identifier.doi10.4337/9781839106255.00015en_US
dc.identifier.isbn978-1-83910-624-8
dc.identifier.isbn978-1-83910-625-5
dc.identifier.otherPURE UUID: 0d81aadb-d931-455c-9be2-4c46e06999b4en_US
dc.identifier.otherPURE ITEMURL: https://research.aalto.fi/en/publications/0d81aadb-d931-455c-9be2-4c46e06999b4en_US
dc.identifier.otherPURE LINK: https://research.tudelft.nl/en/publications/the-multi-level-nature-of-spatial-planning-and-territorial-governen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://aaltodoc.aalto.fi/handle/123456789/129978
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:fi:aalto-202408215541
dc.language.isoenen
dc.relation.ispartofSpatial Planning Systems in Europe: Comparison and Trajectories
dc.relation.ispartofpp. 87-106
dc.rightsembargoedAccessen
dc.subject.keywordMulti-level governanceen_US
dc.subject.keywordPlanning competencesen_US
dc.subject.keywordCentralisationen_US
dc.subject.keywordDecentralisationen_US
dc.subject.keywordDevolutionen_US
dc.titleThe multi-level nature of spatial planning and territorial governanceen
dc.typeA3 Kirjan tai muun kokoomateoksen osafi

Files