Energy conversion at the Earth's magnetopause using single and multispacecraft methods

dc.contributorAalto-yliopistofi
dc.contributorAalto Universityen
dc.contributor.authorAnekallu, C. R.
dc.contributor.authorPalmroth, M.
dc.contributor.authorPulkkinen, Tuija I.
dc.contributor.authorHaaland, S. E.
dc.contributor.authorLucek, E.
dc.contributor.authorDandouras, I.
dc.contributor.schoolSähkötekniikan korkeakoulufi
dc.contributor.schoolSchool of Electrical Engineeringen
dc.date.accessioned2015-03-30T09:00:53Z
dc.date.available2015-03-30T09:00:53Z
dc.date.issued2011
dc.description.abstractWe present a small statistical data set, where we investigate energy conversion at the magnetopause using Cluster measurements of magnetopause crossings. The Cluster observations of magnetic field, plasma velocity, current density and magnetopause orientation are needed to infer the energy conversion at the magnetopause. These parameters can be inferred either from accurate multispacecraft methods, or by using single-spacecraft methods. Our final aim is a large statistical study, for which only single-spacecraft methods can be applied. The Cluster mission provides an opportunity to examine and validate single-spacecraft methods against the multispacecraft methods. For single-spacecraft methods, we use the Generic Residue Analysis (GRA) and a standard one-dimensional current density method using magnetic field measurements. For multispacecraft methods, we use triangulation (Constant Velocity Approach - CVA) and the curlometer technique. We find that in some cases the single-spacecraft methods yield a different sign for the energy conversion than compared to the multispacecraft methods. These sign ambiguities arise from the orientation of the magnetopause, choosing the interval to be analyzed, large normal current and time offset of the current density inferred from the two methods. By using the Finnish Meteorological Institute global MHD simulation GUMICS-4, we are able to determine which sign is likely to be correct, introducing an opportunity to correct the ambiguous energy conversion values. After correcting the few ambiguous cases, we find that the energy conversion estimated from single-spacecraft methods is generally lower by 70% compared to the multispacecraft methods.en
dc.description.versionPeer revieweden
dc.format.extent16
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen
dc.identifier.citationAnekallu, C. R. & Palmroth, M. & Pulkkinen, Tuija I. & Haaland, S. E. & Lucek, E. & Dandouras, I. 2011. Energy conversion at the Earth's magnetopause using single and multispacecraft methods. Journal of Geophysical Research: Space physics, Vol. 116, nro A11204. P. 16. 2156-2202 (electronic). DOI: 10.1029/2011JA016783en
dc.identifier.doi10.1029/2011JA016783
dc.identifier.issn2156-2202 (electronic)
dc.identifier.issn0148-0227 (printed)
dc.identifier.urihttps://aaltodoc.aalto.fi/handle/123456789/15439
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:fi:aalto-201503262098
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherAmerican Geophysical Union. Wileyen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesJournal of Geophysical Research: Space physics, Vol. 116, nro A11204en
dc.rights.holderAmerican Geophysical Union. Wiley
dc.subject.keywordconstant velocity approachen
dc.subject.keywordgeneric residue analysisen
dc.subject.keywordmagnetopause energy conversionen
dc.subject.otherSpace technologyen
dc.titleEnergy conversion at the Earth's magnetopause using single and multispacecraft methodsen
dc.typeA1 Alkuperäisartikkeli tieteellisessä aikakauslehdessäfi
dc.type.dcmitypetexten
dc.type.versionFinal published versionen

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
A1_anekallu_c._r._2011.pdf
Size:
1.1 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format