Regions of Interest as nodes of dynamic functional brain networks

dc.contributorAalto-yliopistofi
dc.contributorAalto Universityen
dc.contributor.authorRyyppö, Elisaen_US
dc.contributor.authorGlerean, Enricoen_US
dc.contributor.authorBrattico, Elviraen_US
dc.contributor.authorSaramäki, Jarien_US
dc.contributor.authorKorhonen, Onervaen_US
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Computer Scienceen
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Neuroscience and Biomedical Engineeringen
dc.contributor.groupauthorProfessorship Saramäki J.en
dc.contributor.groupauthorHelsinki Institute for Information Technology (HIIT)en
dc.date.accessioned2019-01-14T09:19:21Z
dc.date.available2019-01-14T09:19:21Z
dc.date.issued2018-02-22en_US
dc.descriptiondoi: 10.1162/netn_a_00047
dc.description.abstractThe properties of functional brain networks strongly depend on how their nodes are chosen. Commonly, nodes are defined by Regions of Interest (ROIs), predetermined groupings of fMRI measurement voxels. Earlier, we demonstrated that the functional homogeneity of ROIs, captured by their spatial consistency, varies widely across ROIs in commonly used brain atlases. Here, we ask how ROIs behave as nodes of dynamic brain networks. To this end, we use two measures: spatiotemporal consistency measures changes in spatial consistency across time and network turnover quantifies the changes in the local network structure around an ROI. We find that spatial consistency varies non-uniformly in space and time, which is reflected in the variation of spatiotemporal consistency across ROIs. Furthermore, we see time-dependent changes in the network neighborhoods of the ROIs, reflected in high network turnover. Network turnover is nonuniformly distributed across ROIs: ROIs with high spatiotemporal consistency have low network turnover. Finally, we reveal that there is rich voxel-level correlation structure inside ROIs. Because the internal structure and the connectivity of ROIs vary in time, the common approach of using static node definitions may be surprisingly inaccurate. Therefore, network neuroscience would greatly benefit from node definition strategies tailored for dynamical networks.en
dc.description.versionPeer revieweden
dc.format.extent23
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen_US
dc.identifier.citationRyyppö, E, Glerean, E, Brattico, E, Saramäki, J & Korhonen, O 2018, 'Regions of Interest as nodes of dynamic functional brain networks', Network Neuroscience, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 513-535. https://doi.org/10.1162/netn_a_00047en
dc.identifier.doi10.1162/netn_a_00047en_US
dc.identifier.issn2472-1751
dc.identifier.otherPURE UUID: 1d193770-82c8-45bb-a4f0-37da49cb4e7fen_US
dc.identifier.otherPURE ITEMURL: https://research.aalto.fi/en/publications/1d193770-82c8-45bb-a4f0-37da49cb4e7fen_US
dc.identifier.otherPURE FILEURL: https://research.aalto.fi/files/30807962/netn_a_00047.pdfen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://aaltodoc.aalto.fi/handle/123456789/35917
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:fi:aalto-201901141100
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherMIT Press
dc.relation.ispartofseriesNetwork Neuroscienceen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesVolume 2, issue 4, pp. 513-535en
dc.rightsopenAccessen
dc.subject.keywordDynamic brain networksen_US
dc.subject.keywordNode definitionen_US
dc.subject.keywordFunctional homogeneityen_US
dc.subject.keywordNeighborhood turnoveren_US
dc.subject.keywordRegion of Interesten_US
dc.subject.keywordFunctional magnetic resonance imagingen_US
dc.titleRegions of Interest as nodes of dynamic functional brain networksen
dc.typeA1 Alkuperäisartikkeli tieteellisessä aikakauslehdessäfi
dc.type.versionpublishedVersion

Files