A critical review of lithium-ion battery recycling processes from a circular economy perspective

dc.contributorAalto-yliopistofi
dc.contributorAalto Universityen
dc.contributor.authorVelázquez-Martínez, Omaren_US
dc.contributor.authorValio, Johannaen_US
dc.contributor.authorSantasalo-Aarnio, Annukkaen_US
dc.contributor.authorReuter, Markusen_US
dc.contributor.authorSerna-Guerrero, Rodrigoen_US
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Chemical and Metallurgical Engineeringen
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Energy and Mechanical Engineeringen
dc.contributor.groupauthorMineral Processing and Recyclingen
dc.contributor.groupauthorEnergy Conversionen
dc.date.accessioned2020-01-02T13:56:02Z
dc.date.available2020-01-02T13:56:02Z
dc.date.issued2019-12-01en_US
dc.description.abstractLithium-ion batteries (LIBs) are currently one of the most important electrochemical energy storage devices, powering electronic mobile devices and electric vehicles alike. However, there is a remarkable difference between their rate of production and rate of recycling. At the end of their lifecycle, only a limited number of LIBs undergo any recycling treatment, with the majority go to landfills or being hoarded in households. Further losses of LIB components occur because the the state-of-the-art LIB recycling processes are limited to components with high economic value, e.g., Co, Cu, Fe, and Al. With the increasing popularity of concepts such as “circular economy” (CE), new LIB recycling systems have been proposed that target a wider spectrum of compounds, thus reducing the environmental impact associated with LIB production. This review work presents a discussion of the current practices and some of the most promising emerging technologies for recycling LIBs. While other authoritative reviews have focused on the description of recycling processes, the aim of the present was is to offer an analysis of recycling technologies from a CE perspective. Consequently, the discussion is based on the ability of each technology to recover every component in LIBs. The gathered data depicted a direct relationship between process complexity and the variety and usability of the recovered fractions. Indeed, only processes employing a combination of mechanical processing, and hydro-and pyrometallurgical steps seemed able to obtain materials suitable for LIB (re)manufacture. On the other hand, processes relying on pyrometallurgical steps are robust, but only capable of recovering metallic components.en
dc.description.versionPeer revieweden
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen_US
dc.identifier.citationVelázquez-Martínez, O, Valio, J, Santasalo-Aarnio, A, Reuter, M & Serna-Guerrero, R 2019, 'A critical review of lithium-ion battery recycling processes from a circular economy perspective', Batteries, vol. 5, no. 4, 68. https://doi.org/10.3390/batteries5040068en
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/batteries5040068en_US
dc.identifier.issn2313-0105
dc.identifier.otherPURE UUID: 38870ce9-10f2-491a-b796-d6fdc1f06f8cen_US
dc.identifier.otherPURE ITEMURL: https://research.aalto.fi/en/publications/38870ce9-10f2-491a-b796-d6fdc1f06f8cen_US
dc.identifier.otherPURE LINK: http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85075255337&partnerID=8YFLogxKen_US
dc.identifier.otherPURE FILEURL: https://research.aalto.fi/files/39211667/CHEM_Velazquez_Martinez_et_al_Critical_Review_of_Lithium_2019_Batt.pdfen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://aaltodoc.aalto.fi/handle/123456789/41979
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:fi:aalto-202001021090
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherMDPI AG
dc.relation.ispartofseriesBatteriesen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesVolume 5, issue 4en
dc.rightsopenAccessen
dc.subject.keywordCircular economyen_US
dc.subject.keywordLithium-ion batteryen_US
dc.subject.keywordRecycling processesen_US
dc.titleA critical review of lithium-ion battery recycling processes from a circular economy perspectiveen
dc.typeA2 Katsausartikkeli tieteellisessä aikakauslehdessäfi
dc.type.versionpublishedVersion

Files