aalto1 untyped-item.component.html

Association between four-level categorisation of indoor exposure and perceived indoor air quality

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Access rights

openAccess
CC BY

Creative Commons license

Except where otherwised noted, this item's license is described as openAccess
publishedVersion

URL

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

A1 Alkuperäisartikkeli tieteellisessä aikakauslehdessä

Major/Subject

Mcode

Degree programme

Language

en

Pages

15

Series

International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, Volume 15, issue 4

Abstract

The aim of this study was to develop and test a tool for assessing urgency of indoor air quality (IAQ) measures. The condition of the 27 buildings were investigated and results were categorized. Statistical test studied the differences between the categories and the employees complaints about their work environment. To study the employees’ experiences of the work premises, a validated indoor air (IA) questionnaire was used. This study reveals a multifaceted problem: many factors affecting IAQ may also affect perceived IAQ, making it difficult to separate the impurity sources and ventilation system deficiencies affecting to employee experiences. An examination of the relationship between the categories and perceived IAQ revealed an association between the mould odour perceived by employees and mould detected by the researcher. A weak link was also found between the assessed categories and environmental complaints. However, we cannot make far-reaching conclusions regarding the assessed probability of abnormal IA exposure in the building on the basis of employee experiences. According to the results, categorising tool can partly support the assessment of the urgency for repairs when several factors that affect IAQ are taken into account.

Description

Other note

Citation

Tähtinen, K, Lappalainen, S, Karvala, K, Remes, J & Salonen, H 2018, 'Association between four-level categorisation of indoor exposure and perceived indoor air quality', International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, vol. 15, no. 4, 679. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15040679

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Referenced By