Comparison of Anisotropic Energy-Based and Jiles–Atherton Models of Ferromagnetic Hysteresis

Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
A1 Alkuperäisartikkeli tieteellisessä aikakauslehdessä
Date
2020
Major/Subject
Mcode
Degree programme
Language
en
Pages
7
1-7
Series
IEEE Transactions on Magnetics
Abstract
In this article, we apply an anisotropic extension for the energy-based and the Jiles–Atherton (JA) hysteresis models to simulate both unidirectional alternating and rotational magnetic field excitations. The results show a good agreement with measurements for unidirectional alternating fields. However, the results for rotational fields, especially at high magnitudes, show a significant discrepancy with the measurement data. We demonstrate that the JA model with appropriate parameters can estimate the losses in alternating cases up to 1.5 T, whereas both models give reasonable loss estimation up to 1 T in rotational cases.
Description
Keywords
Energy-based (EB) model, Energy-based Jiles–Atherton (JA) model, Magnetic hysteresis, Non-oriented (NO) electrical steel
Other note
Citation
Upadhaya, B, Rasilo, P, Perkkiö, L, Handgruber, P, Belahcen, A & Arkkio, A 2020, ' Comparison of Anisotropic Energy-Based and Jiles–Atherton Models of Ferromagnetic Hysteresis ', IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, vol. 56, no. 4, 8956032 . https://doi.org/10.1109/TMAG.2020.2964745