aalto1 untyped-item.component.html
Comparison of Anisotropic Energy-Based and Jiles–Atherton Models of Ferromagnetic Hysteresis
Loading...
Access rights
openAccess
acceptedVersion
URL
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
A1 Alkuperäisartikkeli tieteellisessä aikakauslehdessä
This publication is imported from Aalto University research portal.
View publication in the Research portal (opens in new window)
View/Open full text file from the Research portal (opens in new window)
View publication in the Research portal (opens in new window)
View/Open full text file from the Research portal (opens in new window)
Unless otherwise stated, all rights belong to the author. You may download, display and print this publication for Your own personal use. Commercial use is prohibited.
Date
Major/Subject
Mcode
Degree programme
Language
en
Pages
7
Series
IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, Volume 56, issue 4
Abstract
In this article, we apply an anisotropic extension for the energy-based and the Jiles–Atherton (JA) hysteresis models to simulate both unidirectional alternating and rotational magnetic field excitations. The results show a good agreement with measurements for unidirectional alternating fields. However, the results for rotational fields, especially at high magnitudes, show a significant discrepancy with the measurement data. We demonstrate that the JA model with appropriate parameters can estimate the losses in alternating cases up to 1.5 T, whereas both models give reasonable loss estimation up to 1 T in rotational cases.
Description
Other note
Citation
Upadhaya, B, Rasilo, P, Perkkiö, L, Handgruber, P, Belahcen, A & Arkkio, A 2020, 'Comparison of Anisotropic Energy-Based and Jiles–Atherton Models of Ferromagnetic Hysteresis', IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, vol. 56, no. 4, 8956032. https://doi.org/10.1109/TMAG.2020.2964745