aalto1 untyped-item.component.html

Exploring noncollinear magnetic energy landscapes with Bayesian optimization

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Access rights

openAccess
CC BY

Creative Commons license

Except where otherwised noted, this item's license is described as openAccess
publishedVersion

URL

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

A1 Alkuperäisartikkeli tieteellisessä aikakauslehdessä

Major/Subject

Mcode

Degree programme

Language

en

Pages

12

Series

Digital Discovery, Volume 4, issue 6, pp. 1639-1650

Abstract

The investigation of magnetic energy landscapes and the search for ground states of magnetic materials using ab initio methods like density functional theory (DFT) is a challenging task. Complex interactions, such as superexchange and spin-orbit coupling, make these calculations computationally expensive and often lead to non-trivial energy landscapes. Consequently, a comprehensive and systematic investigation of large magnetic configuration spaces is often impractical. We approach this problem by utilizing Bayesian optimization, an active machine learning scheme that has proven to be efficient in modeling unknown functions and finding global minima. Using this approach we can obtain the magnetic contribution to the energy as a function of one or more spin canting angles with relatively small numbers of DFT calculations. To assess the capabilities and the efficiency of the approach we investigate the noncollinear magnetic energy landscapes of selected materials containing 3d, 5d and 5f magnetic ions: Ba3MnNb2O9, LaMn2Si2, β-MnO2, Sr2IrO4, UO2, Ba2NaOsO6 and kagome RhMn3. By comparing our results to previous ab initio studies that followed more conventional approaches, we observe significant improvements in efficiency.

Description

Publisher Copyright: © 2025 RSC.

Keywords

Other note

Citation

Baumsteiger, J, Celiberti, L, Rinke, P, Todorović, M & Franchini, C 2025, 'Exploring noncollinear magnetic energy landscapes with Bayesian optimization', Digital Discovery, vol. 4, no. 6, pp. 1639-1650. https://doi.org/10.1039/d4dd00402g

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Referenced By