Bypassing institutional barriers : New types of transit-oriented development in China

dc.contributorAalto-yliopistofi
dc.contributorAalto Universityen
dc.contributor.authorSong, Yunen_US
dc.contributor.authorde Jong, Martinen_US
dc.contributor.authorStead, Dominicen_US
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Built Environmenten
dc.contributor.groupauthorPlanning and Transportationen
dc.contributor.organizationDelft University of Technologyen_US
dc.contributor.organizationErasmus University Rotterdamen_US
dc.date.accessioned2021-03-31T06:17:40Z
dc.date.available2021-03-31T06:17:40Z
dc.date.issued2021-06en_US
dc.descriptionFunding Information: The first author is funded by the China Scholarship Council . We thank the Guangzhou City Planning Design Institute, the Shenzhen Urban Planning and Land Resource Research Centre, and the Foshan Urban Planning Design and Surveying Research Institute for accepting interviews. The authors are indebted to Miaoxi Zhao and Qifeng Yuan of South China University of Technology for providing comments and arranging interviews. We are also grateful for the comments from the editors and two anonymous reviewers which helped us to improve the overall quality of the article. Publisher Copyright: © 2021 The Author(s) Copyright: Copyright 2021 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
dc.description.abstractChina is often viewed as an emerging experimental base for transit-oriented development (TOD) practices because of its rapid urban growth and development of mass transit networks. The implementation of TOD can be heavily influenced by institutional barriers to urban growth. However, some newly emerging types of TOD practice allow planners and decision-makers to bypass some of the institutional barriers and achieve a certain degree of integrated development. Current academic literature, however, has little to say on how these informal institutional solutions go around these barriers. This article aims to fill this gap by examining three different types of TOD practice as applied in Guangzhou and Shenzhen. We analysed and compared the origins and effects of abovementioned informal institutional arrangements under entrepreneurial governance. We found that land value capturing can replace the existing governance mode in which local government heavily relies on revenue from land-leasing and realise better integration of transit and land development. We conclude with several suggestions for institutional reform based on these new types of TOD experiments.en
dc.description.versionPeer revieweden
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen_US
dc.identifier.citationSong, Y, de Jong, M & Stead, D 2021, ' Bypassing institutional barriers : New types of transit-oriented development in China ', Cities, vol. 113, 103177 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2021.103177en
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.cities.2021.103177en_US
dc.identifier.issn0264-2751
dc.identifier.otherPURE UUID: cbaa0dd2-c02b-4c8e-8b13-1241ff06921cen_US
dc.identifier.otherPURE ITEMURL: https://research.aalto.fi/en/publications/cbaa0dd2-c02b-4c8e-8b13-1241ff06921cen_US
dc.identifier.otherPURE LINK: http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85102388654&partnerID=8YFLogxKen_US
dc.identifier.otherPURE FILEURL: https://research.aalto.fi/files/61232821/1_s2.0_S0264275121000755_main.pdfen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://aaltodoc.aalto.fi/handle/123456789/103482
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:fi:aalto-202103312755
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherELSEVIER SCI LTD
dc.relation.ispartofseriesCitiesen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesVolume 113en
dc.rightsopenAccessen
dc.subject.keywordEntrepreneurial governanceen_US
dc.subject.keywordInstitutional barriersen_US
dc.subject.keywordRail plus property developmenten_US
dc.subject.keywordTransit-adjacent developmenten_US
dc.subject.keywordTransit-oriented developmenten_US
dc.subject.keywordTransport huben_US
dc.subject.keywordUrban governanceen_US
dc.titleBypassing institutional barriers : New types of transit-oriented development in Chinaen
dc.typeA1 Alkuperäisartikkeli tieteellisessä aikakauslehdessäfi
dc.type.versionpublishedVersion

Files