Oversampling for Nonlinear Waveshaping: Choosing the Right Filters
Loading...
Access rights
openAccess
publishedVersion
URL
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
A1 Alkuperäisartikkeli tieteellisessä aikakauslehdessä
This publication is imported from Aalto University research portal.
View publication in the Research portal (opens in new window)
View/Open full text file from the Research portal (opens in new window)
View publication in the Research portal (opens in new window)
View/Open full text file from the Research portal (opens in new window)
Date
Major/Subject
Mcode
Degree programme
Language
en
Pages
10
Series
Journal of the Audio Engineering Society, Volume 67, issue 6, pp. 440–449
Abstract
An assessment of filters for classic oversampled audio waveshaping schemes is carried out, pursuing aliasing reduction. For this purpose, the quality measure of the A-weighted noise-to-mask ratio is computed for test tones covering the frequency range from 27.5 Hz to 4.186 kHz, sampled at 44.1 kHz, and processed at eight-times oversampling. All filters are designed to have their passband contained within a ±1 dB range and to exhibit a minimum stopband attenuation value of 40 dB. Waveshaping of sinusoids via hard clipping is investigated—spectral enrichment due to the discontinuities introduced by its nonlinear transfer function maximizes aliasing distortion. The obtained results suggest that linear interpolation equalized with a high shelving filter is a sufficiently good method for upsampling. Concerning decimation, the interpolated FIR, elliptic, and cascaded integrator-comb filters all improve the results with respect to the trivial case. The cascaded integrator-comb filter is the only tested decimation filter that achieves perceptually sufficient aliasing suppression for the entire frequency range when combined with the linear interpolator.Description
Keywords
Other note
Citation
Kahles, J, Esqueda Flores, F & Välimäki, V 2019, 'Oversampling for Nonlinear Waveshaping: Choosing the Right Filters', Journal of the Audio Engineering Society, vol. 67, no. 6, pp. 440–449. https://doi.org/10.17743/jaes.2019.0012