Comparative carbon footprint analysis of residents of wooden and non-wooden houses in Finland
Loading...
Access rights
openAccess
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
A1 Alkuperäisartikkeli tieteellisessä aikakauslehdessä
This publication is imported from Aalto University research portal.
View publication in the Research portal
View/Open full text file from the Research portal
View publication in the Research portal
View/Open full text file from the Research portal
Date
2021-07
Department
Major/Subject
Mcode
Degree programme
Language
en
Pages
11
Series
Environmental Research Letters, Volume 16, issue 7
Abstract
Sustainable forest management and harvested wood products together can create a growing carbon sink by storing carbon in long-lived products. The role of wood products in climate change mitigation has been studied from several perspectives, but not yet from a consumer's view. In this study, we examine the impact of wooden housing on consumer carbon footprints in Finland. We use the 2016 Finnish Household Budget Survey and Exiobase 2015, a global multi-regional input-output model. The sample size is 3700 households, of which 45% live in a wooden house. We find that residents of wooden houses have a 12(+/- 3)% (950 kg CO2-eq/year) lower carbon footprint on average than residents of non-wooden houses, when income, household type, education of the main income provider, age of the house, owner-occupancy and urban zone are controlled in regression analysis. This is not fully explained by the impact of the construction material, which suggests that the residents of wooden houses may have some features in their lifestyles that lower their carbon footprints further. In addition, we find that an investment in a new wooden house in an urban area has a strong reducing impact on a consumer's carbon footprint, while investments in other types of housing have a weaker or no reducing impact. Our findings support wooden housing as a meaningful sustainable consumption choice.Description
Keywords
wood products, wood construction, negative rebound effect, green investment, sustainable consumption, ENERGY, BUILDINGS, CONSUMPTION, EMISSIONS, PRODUCTS, REBOUNDS, BENEFITS, INCREASE, LCA
Other note
Citation
Ottelin, J, Amiri, A, Steubing, B & Junnila, S 2021, ' Comparative carbon footprint analysis of residents of wooden and non-wooden houses in Finland ', Environmental Research Letters, vol. 16, no. 7, 074006 . https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ac06f9
