Ownership of learning in monitoring technology: Design case of self-monitoring tech in independent study
Loading...
Access rights
openAccess
URL
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
A1 Alkuperäisartikkeli tieteellisessä aikakauslehdessä
This publication is imported from Aalto University research portal.
View publication in the Research portal (opens in new window)
View/Open full text file from the Research portal (opens in new window)
Other link related to publication (opens in new window)
View publication in the Research portal (opens in new window)
View/Open full text file from the Research portal (opens in new window)
Other link related to publication (opens in new window)
Date
2020
Department
Major/Subject
Mcode
Degree programme
Language
en
Pages
22
133 – 154
133 – 154
Series
Interaction Design and Architecture(s), issue 45
Abstract
Psychological ownership has been connected to agency, engagement and control. In technology-enhanced learning, this means that the technology design aids learners to get involved, make choices and feel responsible for their learning. In this paper we present a design case in which we explore how self-monitoring tools might support ownership of learning from two perspectives: from the technology design and from the learners’ experiences when using a prototype that uses self-monitoring technology. We describe the design process of a prototype that incorporates self-monitoring of physiological data and analyze the results of the tests conducted with the version 2.0 of the prototype in order to assess to what extent the prototype supports different dimensions of self-regulated learning. Based on the research results, we claim that ownership should be regarded as a process that can be fostered through participatory design approaches and by supporting reflection when using the tools.Description
Keywords
Other note
Citation
Durall Gazulla, E, Virnes, M, Leinonen, T & Gros, B 2020, ' Ownership of learning in monitoring technology : Design case of self-monitoring tech in independent study ', Interaction Design and Architecture(s), no. 45, pp. 133 – 154 . < http://www.mifav.uniroma2.it/inevent/events/idea2010/doc/45_6.pdf >