aalto1 untyped-item.component.html

Comparison of 2D simulations of detached divertor plasmas with divertor Thomson measurements in the DIII-D tokamak

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Access rights

openAccess
publishedVersion

URL

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

A1 Alkuperäisartikkeli tieteellisessä aikakauslehdessä

Date

Major/Subject

Mcode

Degree programme

Language

en

Pages

7

Series

Nuclear Materials and Energy, Volume 12, pp. 44-50

Abstract

A modeling study is reported using new 2D data from DIII-D tokamak divertor plasmas and improved 2D transport model that includes large cross-field drifts for the numerically difficult low anomalous transport regime associated with the H-mode. The data set, which spans a range of plasma densities for both forward and reverse toroidal magnetic field (Bt ), is provided by divertor Thomson scattering (DTS). Measurements utilizing X-point sweeping give corresponding 2D profiles of electron temperature (Te ) and density (ne ) across both divertor legs for individual discharges. The simulations focus on the open magnetic field-line regions, though they also include a small region of closed field lines. The calculations show the same features of in/out divertor plasma asymmetries as measured in the experiment, with the normal Bt direction (ion ∇. B drift toward the X-point) having higher ne and lower Te in the inner divertor leg than outer. Corresponding emission data for total radiated power shows a strong inner-divertor/outer-divertor asymmetry that is reproduced by the simulations. These 2D UEDGE transport simulations are enabled for steep-gradient H-mode conditions by newly implemented algorithms to control isolated grid-scale irregularities.

Description

Other note

Citation

Rognlien, T D, McLean, A G, Fenstermacher, M E, Groth, M, Jaervinen, A E, Joseph, I, Lasnier, C J, Meyer, W, Moser, A, Porter, G D & Umansky, M V 2017, 'Comparison of 2D simulations of detached divertor plasmas with divertor Thomson measurements in the DIII-D tokamak', Nuclear Materials and Energy, vol. 12, pp. 44-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nme.2016.12.002

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Referenced By