Risk analysis in maritime transportation : principles, frameworks and evaluation

Thumbnail Image

Files

isbn9789526063140.pdf (2.29 MB)
Errata_Goerlandt_Floris_DD_107_2015_publications_P1_P4.pdf (111.58 KB)

URL

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

School of Engineering | Doctoral thesis (article-based) | Defence date: 2015-10-30
Checking the digitized thesis and permission for publishing
Instructions for the author
Unless otherwise stated, all rights belong to the author. You may download, display and print this publication for Your own personal use. Commercial use is prohibited.

Authors

Date

2015

Department

Sovelletun mekaniikan laitos
Department of Applied Mechanics

Major/Subject

Mcode

Degree programme

Language

en

Pages

73 + app. 94

Series

Aalto University publication series DOCTORAL DISSERTATIONS, 107/2015

Abstract

Risk analyses are widely used tools for supporting decision making. Nonetheless, many criticisms have been raised against the discipline of risk analysis, e.g. technical analyses having a narrow focus, poorly examined claims of the ability of accurately measuring risk and lack of standards for quality assurance and risk analysis evaluation. In response to these criticisms, calls have been made for increased focus on these and other foundational issues, both in the general risk analysis discipline and in the various application areas. This thesis answers these calls for research addressing the underlying concepts and principles of risk analyses, which are approached through applications focusing on the accidental risk of maritime transportation. Focusing first on a set of foundational issues underlying waterway risk analyses, it is established that many different definitions, perspectives and scientific approaches co-exist in the application area. Through two case studies of reliability of maritime risk models, previous research claiming that risk models provide unreliable decision support, are confirmed for some maritime applications, thus confirming the need for focusing on risk related principles. Subsequently, a set of principles is presented, addressing concepts and terminology, risk and prediction, risk model use and the consideration of uncertainty and bias. A framework is introduced to communicate the scientific principles adhered to in a specific risk analysis. Following this, the principles are translated in two risk analysis frameworks: one for policy-oriented and one for operational risk analysis; the first leading to a quantitative and the second to a qualitative risk characterization. In both, risk is understood as a concept referring to the possible but uncertain occurrence of a situation where something of human value is at stake. Risk models are used as putting forward an argument based on available evidence, as a tool for communication between stakeholders and as a platform for thinking. Uncertainties and value-laden biases are assessed, and some tools for communicating these are introduced. Both frameworks are illustrated by extensive case studies. The first concerns accidental risk of oil spills from tanker collisions in the Gulf of Finland. The second focuses on a risk-informed ship-ship collision alert system. A final issue addressed in the thesis concerns the evaluation of a risk analysis, i.e. principles and criteria for establishing credibility. An integrated framework for this is developed, addressing model use, model plausibility, value-related validity and process-related validity. Specific evaluation criteria are proposed and a selection of these is applied in the presented case studies.

Description

Supervising professor

Kujala, Pentti, Prof., Aalto University, Department of Applied Mechanics, Finland

Thesis advisor

Kujala, Pentti, Prof., Aalto University, Department of Applied Mechanics, Finland
Montewka, Jakub, Dr., Finnish Geospatial Research Institute, Finland

Keywords

risk analysis, foundational issues, waterway risk, collision alert system

Other note

Parts

  • [Publication 1]: Goerlandt, Floris; Montewka, Jakub. 2015. Maritime transportation risk analysis: review and analysis in light of some foundational issues. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, volume 138, pages 115-134. ISSN 0951-8320. DOI 10.1016/j.ress.2015.01.025
  • [Publication 2]: Goerlandt, Floris; Kujala, Pentti. 2014. On the reliability and validity of ship-ship collision risk analysis in light of different perspectives on risk. Safety Science, volume 62, pages 348-365. ISSN 0925-7535. DOI 10.1016/j.ssci.2013.09.010
  • [Publication 3]: Goerlandt, Floris; Montewka, Jakub. 2015. A framework for risk analysis of maritime transportation systems: a case study for oil spill from tankers in a ship-ship collision. Safety Science, volume 76, pages 42-66. ISSN 0925-7535. DOI 10.1016/j.ssci.2015.02.009
  • [Publication 4]: Goerlandt, Floris; Montewka, Jakub; Kuzmin, Vladimir; Kujala, Pentti. 2015. A risk-informed ship collision alert system: framework and application. Safety Science, volume 77, pages 182-204. ISSN 0925-7535. DOI 10.1016/j.ssci.2015.03.015

Citation

Permanent link to this item

https://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-952-60-6314-0

Collections

[diss] Insinööritieteiden korkeakoulu / ENG