Idea Generation Mechanisms : Comparing the Influence of Classification, Combination, Building on Others, and Stimulation Mechanisms on Ideation Effectiveness

dc.contributorAalto-yliopistofi
dc.contributorAalto Universityen
dc.contributor.authorDeo, Saurabhen_US
dc.contributor.authorBlej, Aimaneen_US
dc.contributor.authorKirjavainen, Sennien_US
dc.contributor.authorHoltta-Otto, Katjaen_US
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Energy and Mechanical Engineeringen
dc.contributor.departmentDesign Factoryen
dc.contributor.groupauthorProduct Developmenten
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-24T07:26:34Z
dc.date.available2021-11-24T07:26:34Z
dc.date.issued2021-12-01en_US
dc.description.abstractIdeation methods have been extensively studied, and several ideation methods can be beneficial in different contexts, but it is not understood what makes a specific method work. Previous work has shown that all the ideation methods comprise of 25 fundamental ideation mechanisms in two categories: idea implementation and idea promoting mechanisms. In this study, we try to understand how individual mechanisms affect idea generation outcomes. We chose four idea promoting mechanisms: two from the process category (Classification and Combination) and two from the idea sources category (Building on Others and Stimulation). These mechanisms were selected as they are examples of comparable mechanisms that could be integrated into any other ideation method. We conducted four experiments and assessed idea quantity, novelty, and originality. Our study showed that the chosen mechanisms increased ideation performance. For the most part, the mechanisms are statistically equivalent, but we found evidence that classification outperforms combination in nonengineering concept generation exercise. We also found the building on others can be more useful than the type of stimulation used in engineering concept generation, but the difference was not found in nonengineering concept generation. Overall, we found evidence that all mechanisms improve ideation effectiveness and could be incorporated into any ideation method, but further studies are needed to build a more comprehensive understanding.en
dc.description.versionPeer revieweden
dc.format.extent14
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen_US
dc.identifier.citationDeo, S, Blej, A, Kirjavainen, S & Holtta-Otto, K 2021, ' Idea Generation Mechanisms : Comparing the Influence of Classification, Combination, Building on Others, and Stimulation Mechanisms on Ideation Effectiveness ', Journal of Mechanical Design, vol. 143, no. 12, 121403 . https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4051239en
dc.identifier.doi10.1115/1.4051239en_US
dc.identifier.issn1050-0472
dc.identifier.issn1528-9001
dc.identifier.otherPURE UUID: fd64d2c1-a61c-465b-993d-2c2f1e606918en_US
dc.identifier.otherPURE ITEMURL: https://research.aalto.fi/en/publications/fd64d2c1-a61c-465b-993d-2c2f1e606918en_US
dc.identifier.otherPURE FILEURL: https://research.aalto.fi/files/76056779/ENG_Saurabh_et_al_Idea_Generation_Mechanisms_Journal_of_Mechanical_Design.pdfen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://aaltodoc.aalto.fi/handle/123456789/111265
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:fi:aalto-2021112410424
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherASME
dc.relation.ispartofseriesJournal of Mechanical Designen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesVolume 143, issue 12en
dc.rightsopenAccessen
dc.subject.keywordconceptual designen_US
dc.subject.keywordcreativity and concept generationen_US
dc.subject.keyworddesign methodologyen_US
dc.subject.keyworddesign theory and methodologyen_US
dc.subject.keywordDESIGN HEURISTICSen_US
dc.subject.keywordEXTENDED EFFORTen_US
dc.subject.keywordINCUBATIONen_US
dc.subject.keywordPRINCIPLEen_US
dc.subject.keywordQUALITYen_US
dc.titleIdea Generation Mechanisms : Comparing the Influence of Classification, Combination, Building on Others, and Stimulation Mechanisms on Ideation Effectivenessen
dc.typeA1 Alkuperäisartikkeli tieteellisessä aikakauslehdessäfi
dc.type.versionacceptedVersion

Files