Business ethics and sovereignty in settler colonial states
Loading...
Access rights
openAccess
URL
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
A1 Alkuperäisartikkeli tieteellisessä aikakauslehdessä
This publication is imported from Aalto University research portal.
View publication in the Research portal (opens in new window)
View/Open full text file from the Research portal (opens in new window)
Other link related to publication (opens in new window)
View publication in the Research portal (opens in new window)
View/Open full text file from the Research portal (opens in new window)
Other link related to publication (opens in new window)
Authors
Date
2019-01-01
Major/Subject
Mcode
Degree programme
Language
en
Pages
25
1-25
1-25
Series
International Indigenous Policy Journal, Volume 10, issue 3
Abstract
The objective of this conceptual article is to make the case that Indigenous Cemanáhuacan nations' sovereignty is valid throughout all of Cemanáhuac (the Americas), thus rendering settler colonial laws illegitimate and illegal. This in turn means that firms need to abide by Indigenous Cemanáhuacan nations' laws. Theories relating to business, business ethics, compliance, and sustainability reflecting the assumptions of settler colonial sovereignty need to be reworked to take into account the ethical and legal reality of Indigenous Cemanáhuacan nations' sovereignty. Without coercion-free recognition from Indigenous Cemanáhuacan nations, firms cannot accept any claim of government authority, ownership, or sovereignty made by settler colonial states. This article closes a gap in the literature between Indigenous sovereignty and business ethics in a settler colonial context.Description
Keywords
Business ethics, Central America, Ethical strategy, Indigenous nations, Indigenous sovereignty, Legal pluralism, North America, South America, Theory of law
Other note
Citation
Poesche, J 2019, ' Business ethics and sovereignty in settler colonial states ', International Indigenous Policy Journal, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 1-25 . https://doi.org/10.18584/iipj.2019.10.3.8251