aalto1 untyped-item.component.html

Reintroducing light to the study of organizations : affective montages from the Cluny Monastery

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Access rights

openAccess
CC BY

Creative Commons license

Except where otherwised noted, this item's license is described as openAccess
publishedVersion

URL

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

A1 Alkuperäisartikkeli tieteellisessä aikakauslehdessä

Major/Subject

Mcode

Degree programme

Language

en

Pages

25

Series

Organization Studies, Volume 46, issue 12, pp. 1733-1757

Abstract

This article revives the study of light and organization and explores how light, as a generator of organizational atmospheres, is part of organizational life. The study is set in the ruins of the 13th-century Cluny monastery north of Lyon, France, where I combine ethnographic detail, material from old Benedictine rule books, contemporary archaeological excavation data, and fictive videographic elements of a monk?s experience of light and work to produce affective montages of light experiences. The result is a collection of montages exhibiting both moments where light guides towards the pure, ideal and divine and moments where the surprising, embodied and neglected emerges. I suggest light as an important atmosphere generator and foreground an interplay between light experiences of both distance-based control and affective reactions that rely on an immersive body. The experiential light interplay oscillates between deliberately idealistic light control and visceral affective daydreaming under monastic light. Methodologically, I propose the technique of affective montage as a poetic approach for the study of light in organizations. Importantly, through a study of light at the Cluny monastery, this article reintroduces light as a central topic to organization research.

Description

Other note

Citation

Gylfe, P 2025, 'Reintroducing light to the study of organizations : affective montages from the Cluny Monastery', Organization Studies, vol. 46, no. 12, 01708406251370496, pp. 1733-1757. https://doi.org/10.1177/01708406251370496

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Referenced By